VILAS POLYMER PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the second notice issued under Section 148 was invalid as it was issued without complying with the mandatory procedures under Section 148A, especially after the initial reassessment proceedings were dropped. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed.
What were the facts?
Following a search and seizure operation, the assessee company was subjected to reassessment proceedings. The Assessing Officer issued a notice under Section 148, which was later dropped. Subsequently, a fresh notice under Section 148 was issued without adhering to the procedure laid down in Section 148A.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by issuing a second notice under Section 148 after the first was dropped, and whether the procedure under Section 148A was followed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 132,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 149,Section 151
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(17)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Chhugamal Rajpal v. S.P. Chaliha363 citing79 ITR 603 · 1971 · SC
- CIT v. S. Goyanka Lime & Chemical Ltd.340 citing64 Taxmann.com 313 · 2015 · SC
- PCIT v. Ojjus Medicare (P) Ltd.277 citing465 ITR 101 · 2024 · HC
- Kankanala Ravindra Reddy v. ITO213 citing156 Taxmann.com 178 · 2023 · HC
- Madhya Pradesh in CIT v. S. Goyanka Lime & Chemicals Ltd.188 citing56 Taxmann.com 390 · 2015 · HC
- Chandra Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad163 citing8 SCC 266 · 1999 · SC
- Arjun Singh v. ADIT102 citing246 ITR 363 · 2000 · HC
- Pvt Ltd. v. ACIT98 citing475 ITR 360 · 2018 · HC
- Ess Adv. (Mauritius) S. N. C. Et Compagnie v. ACIT59 citing2021 SCC OnLine DEL 3613 · 2021
- Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Price Waterhouse58 citing3 SCC 722 · 2002
- Municipal Corporation Greater Mumbai (MCGM) v. Abhilash Lal28 citing111 Taxmann.com 405 · 2019 · SC
- Opto Circuit India Ltd. v. Axis Bank26 citing127 Taxmann.com 290 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- P. Satyanarayana Chetty v. Income Tax Officer25 citing101 ITR 385 · 1975 · HC
- Ess Advertising (Mauritius) S. N. C. Et Compagnie v. Asstt. CIT (International Taxation)14 citing128 Taxmann.com 120 · 2021 · HC
- Ladhuram Laxmi Narayan v. ITO, Additonal12 citing102 ITR 595 · 1976
- 237 Taxmann.com 3787 citing237 Taxmann.com 378
- Pr. CIT v. Pioneer Tower Planners Pvt. Ltd.5 citing456 ITR 356 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI MANJUNATHA G.
PER BENCH:
The above six appeals filed by the Assessee viz., Vilas Polymer Private Limited are directed against the separate Orders dated 29.10.2025 and 30.10.2025, of the learned CIT(A), Hyderabad-11, Hyderabad, arising from the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, pursuant to the search & seizure operations u/s 132 of the Act, dated 04/01/2023, in case of Excel Group
2 ITA.Nos.1870 to 1875/Hyd./2025 of Companies including the assessee for the A.Ys 2014-15 to 2019-20 respectively. Since common issues are raised in this group
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026