VIDYUT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It allowed the assessee's claim for deduction of expenses against interest income, following the principle of mutuality. The Tribunal also directed the Assessing Officer to verify and allow credit for self-assessment tax paid by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee society filed an appeal with a delay of 8 days, citing the Chartered Accountant's preoccupation with tax audits. The appeal primarily concerned the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of a Faceless Assessing Officer, and the disallowance of certain expenses.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by a JAO instead of a Faceless AO, and whether expenses incurred by a cooperative housing society could be set off against its interest income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 148A,Section 148,Section 147,Section 144B,Section 151A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Hexaware Technologies Ltd. v. ACIT288 citing464 ITR 430 · 2024 · HC
- Kankanala Ravindra Reddy v. ITO213 citing156 Taxmann.com 178 · 2023 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘SMC’ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the Order dated 27.08.2025 of the learned CIT(A)-National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short “NFAC], Delhi, for the assessment year 2018-2019. 2. There is a delay of 8 days in filing the present appeal. The assessee society filed a petition for condonation of delay along with affidavit of the Secretary of the assessee
2 ITA.No.1878/Hyd./2025 society. The learned Authorised Representative of the Assessee has submitted that the limitation for filing the appeal in the case of the assessee was expiring at the same time when the due date of filing the tax
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148A
- Rajesh Kumar Khandelwal, Jaipur vs ITO Ward 5(1), JaipurITA 21/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 658/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026