VALUELABS LLP,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the definition of 'carbon credit' in Section 115BBG is precise and restrictive, requiring validation under the UNFCC mechanism for reduction of carbon dioxide emissions. RECs, issued under the Electricity Act, do not meet this definition. Therefore, income from RECs is not eligible for the concessional tax rate under Section 115BBG.
What were the facts?
The assessee firm earned income from the sale of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and offered it to tax under Section 115BBG at a concessional rate of 10%. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed this, stating that Section 115BBG applies only to 'carbon credits' and not RECs. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's order.
What were the issues?
Whether income from the sale of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) is eligible for the concessional tax rate under Section 115BBG of the Income Tax Act, and if not, whether it qualifies for deduction under Section 801A.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Sood
PER. RAVISH SOOD, J.M: The present appeal filed by the assessee firm is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, dated 13/08/2025, which in turn arises from the order passed by the Assessing Officer (for short, “AO”) under section 143(3) r.w.s 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, "the Act"), dated 27/09/2022 for the Assessment Year (AY) 23/11/2021.
The assessee firm has assailed the impugned order of the CIT(A) on the following grounds of appeal: The order of the Ld. CIT (A)
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115BBG
- Jindal Saw Ltd., New Delhi vs DCIT, Circle- 13(2), New DelhiITA 463/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: Disposed13 Jul 2026AY 2013-14
- Jindal Saw Ltd., New Delhi vs DCIT, Circle- 13(2), New DelhiITA 2748/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed13 Jul 2026AY 2013-14
- Jindal Saw Ltd., New Delhi vs DCIT, Circle- 13(2), New DelhiITA 2747/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed13 Jul 2026AY 2012-13
- DCIT, Circle- 13(2), New Delhi vs Jindal Saw Ltd., New DelhiITA 2384/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed13 Jul 2026AY 2013-14
- DCIT, Circle- 13(2), New Delhi vs Jindal Saw Ltd., New DelhiITA 2383/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed13 Jul 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026