WESTWELL IRON & STEEL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 2,, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2498/KOL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 January 2026AY 2009-2010Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM AND SHRIPRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY (Judicial Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) dismissed additional evidence despite the assessee meeting Rule 46A requirements. In the interest of justice, the Tribunal restored the issue to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication, ensuring a proper hearing opportunity for the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2009-10. The assessee contended that the CIT(A) dismissed additional evidence without considering Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, violating principles of natural justice.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing additional evidence filed by the assessee without proper consideration, violating principles of natural justice.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, KOLKATA

For Appellant: Shri V.K. Jain, AR
For Respondent: Shri S.B. Chakraborthy, DR
Hearing: 07.01.2026Pronounced: 20.01.2026

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 02.09.2025 for the AY 2009-10.

2.

At the outset, the Learned Counsel of the assessee submitted before us that the Learned CIT (A) has passed the appellate order by dismissing the additional evidences filed by the assessee despite the assessee meeting the requirement of provisions of Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the order passed by the Learned CIT (A) is in violation of the principles of natural justice and fair play and accordingly, the

3.

The learned DR on the other hand did not object for the same.

4.

After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that the order has been passed by dismissing the additional evidences filed by the assessee despite the assessee meeting the requirement of provisions of Rule 46A of the IT Rules. We therefore, in the interest of justice and being fair to both the parties, deem it appropriate to afford one more opportunity to the assessee by restoring the issue to the file of the ld. CIT (A) for denovo adjudication. Needless, to mention that proper opportunity of being heard to be provided to the assessee and that the assessee should not seek any adjournments unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. Grounds of appeal raised by assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 20.01.2026.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →