BRGD SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issue of sale of unlisted shares was covered by a coordinate bench decision in a group company's case with similar facts. The earlier assessments had accepted these investments, and the assessee had provided all necessary evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee company's case was reopened based on information regarding reversal trades in stock options and sale of unlisted equity shares. The Assessing Officer made additions under Section 68 for these transactions. The CIT(A) partly deleted the addition.
What were the issues?
Whether additions made under Section 68 for the sale of unlisted equity shares are justified when the investments were accepted in earlier assessment years and supported by documentary evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 68,Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(3),Section 115JB
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM & SHRIPRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JM
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
These are cross appeals against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 15.04.2025 for the AY 2016-17. At the outset, we observe from the appeal folder in ITA No. 1966/KOL/2025 that there is a delay of 26 days in filing the appeal by the department in support of which condonation petition was filed. It was stated in the condonation petition tha
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026