BHARATKUMAR KALYANJIBHAI BHINDI,JUNAGADH vs. PCIT, RAJKOT-1, RAJKOT , RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was invalid as the AO's assessment orders were not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue. However, one appeal was partly allowed concerning the late payment of employee PF contribution.
What were the facts?
The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (PCIT) invoked Section 263 powers, citing that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to assess excess stock found during survey proceedings and did not inquire into a fall in gross profit. The assessees challenged these revisions.
What were the issues?
Whether the PCIT correctly exercised revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 when the AO's assessment was based on plausible views and inquiries, and whether the AO's failure to tax excess stock and investigate profit fall made the order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 263,Section 69A,Section 115BBE,Section 143(3),Section 69B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT2,943 citing243 ITR 83 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Max India Ltd.1,162 citing295 ITR 282 · 2007 · SC
- CIT v. Sunbeam Auto Ltd.897 citing332 ITR 167 · 2011 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn540 citing41 Taxmann.com 100 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. Vikas Polymers318 citing341 ITR 537 · 2012 · HC
- CIT v. J.L. Morrison (India) Ltd.124 citing366 ITR 593 · 2014 · HC
- Ranka Jewellers v. Addl. CIT50 citing328 ITR 148 · 2010 · HC
- Chroma Business Ltd. v. DCIT38 citing82 TTJ 540 · 2004 · ITAT
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Sr.
No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 324/Rjt/2024 322/Rjt/2024 323/Rjt/2024 312/Rjt/2024 326/Rjt/2024 327/Rjt/2024 329/Rjt/2024 331/Rjt/2024 335/Rjt/2024 371/Rjt/2024 ITA No.
Asstt.
Year 2019- 20 2019- 20 2019- 20 2019- 20 2019- 20 2018- 19 2018- 19 2019- 20 2019- 20 2019- 20 Appellant M/s. Deepmala Marine Exports New Fisheries Terminal Gate, Bhidiya Plot, Veraval-362269 PAN No.: AABFD4284G M/s. Sun Exports Plot No.1313, GIDC Estate, Somnath Road, Veraval – 362269 PAN No.: ACAFS3664A Shri Chunilal Govind Vanik Ashaganga Exports, Plot No. 310/B, Somnath Road, GIDC Estate, Veraval - 362267 PAN No.:AAUPV5100G Shri BharatkumarKalyanjibhai Bhindi Prop. of M/s. K. D. Bhindi, Kalyan Complex, Haveli Lane, Junagadh- 362001 PAN No.: ABWPB2758D Shri Kishor VeljibhaiFofandi Prop. of Deepmala Fisheries, Plot No. 305, GIDC Estate, Veraval- 362268 PAN No.:AABPF9318D Shri Samji Nathu Vaishya Prop. of Royal Traders& Somnath Bar, Bunder Chowk, Nr. Petrol Pump, Diu-362520 PAN No.: AAYPV6872B Shri HetalkumarPravinchandraRajyaguru Surya Nagar, Ambika Bh
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026