MUTHIAH LAKSHMANAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-3(5), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) had provided opportunities for hearing and the assessee had filed submissions. However, the assessee's representative argued that documents and submissions were ignored. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remitted the matter back to the AO for fresh assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a return admitting Nil income, but disclosed sale consideration of shares/MF units on which STT was paid. The AO, finding the assessee non-responsive to notices, made additions under sections 69 and for STCG, leading to a substantial total income. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) correctly decided the appeal on merits without considering all documentary evidence and submissions, and whether the case should be remitted back to the AO for fresh consideration of additional evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA
PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM :
This appeal of the assessee is filed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi, (in short “ld.CIT(A)”) for the assessment year (A.Y.) 2022-23, vide order dated 17.09.2025. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual, earning income from trading activities through ICICI Direct, Zerodha, Kotak Securities and has filed his r
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026