UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD,CHENNAI vs. PCIT, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the PCIT's order regarding the treatment of unclaimed policyholder funds was justified due to lack of specific enquiry by the AO. However, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's grounds concerning IBNR/IBNER provisions, finding them to be ascertained liabilities, thus quashing the PCIT's revisionary order on this point.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed exemption under Section 10(38) for profits on sale of investments. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) initiated revision proceedings under Section 263, holding the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The PCIT also questioned the treatment of unclaimed policyholder funds and provisions for IBNR/IBNER claims.
What were the issues?
Whether the PCIT was justified in revising the assessment order regarding exemption under Section 10(38) and the treatment of unclaimed policyholder funds and IBNR/IBNER provisions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Escorts Ltd.60 citing338 ITR 435 · 2011 · HC
- Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. DCIT22 citing174 Taxmann.com 603 · 2025 · HC
- PCIT v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.6 citing254 Taxmann 238 · HC
- 14 ITR 2494 citing14 ITR 249
- GIC v. CIT4 citing240 ITR 739
Before: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadish
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The appeal in ITA No. 1759/Chny/2019 filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 29.03.2019 passed by the Id. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Chennai
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(38)
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Karan Dilipkumar Patel L/H of Late… vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vapi…ITA 353/SRT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jay Patel, Raipur vs ITO, Ward-3(1), RaipurITA 684/RPR/2026[2015-16]Status: Heard12 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026