D.A.V. EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-2, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notice for reassessment under section 148 was not maintainable because a revised return was pending and the notice was issued beyond the permissible time limit for issuing a notice under section 143(2). Consequently, the reassessment order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust's reassessment proceedings were challenged on grounds of limitation, failure to provide actual reasons for reopening, and change of opinion. The Tribunal noted that a revised return was filed, and the notice for reassessment was issued after the limitation period for issuing a notice under section 143(2) had expired.
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated considering the pendency of a revised return and the limitation period for issuing a notice under section 143(2).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 139(5),Section 11
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(23)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.1,673 citing320 ITR 561 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO1,349 citing259 ITR 19 · 2003 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.439 citing108 Taxmann.com 176 · 2002 · HC
- ACIT v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority390 citing449 ITR 389 · 2022 · SC
- Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. v. ITO384 citing41 ITR 191 · 1961 · SC · Read judgment
- Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT323 citing101 ITR 234 · 1975 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Usha International Ltd.231 citing348 ITR 485 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Eicher Ltd.171 citing294 ITR 310 · 2007 · HC
- Venkataswami Naidu & Co. v. CIT133 citing35 ITR 594 · 1959 · SC
- CIT v. Fr. Mullers Charitable Institutions117 citing363 ITR 230 · 2014 · HC
- 1. Kalyanji Mavji& Co. v. CIT116 citing247 ITR 818 · 2001 · SC
- Asstt. CIT v. Thanthi Trust98 citing247 ITR 785 · 2001 · SC
- CIT v. Gujarat Power Corporation Ltd.80 citing350 ITR 266 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- Raja J. Rameshwar Rao v. CIT54 citing42 ITR 179 · 1961 · SC
- New Noble Educational Society v. CIT52 citing143 Taxmann.com 276 · 2022 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Qatalys Software Technologies Ltd.40 citing308 ITR 249 · 2009 · HC
- KLM Royal Dutch Airlines v. Assistant Director of Income Tax35 citing304 ITR 264 · 2008 · HC · Read judgment
- 11th June, 1996. 4. In Trustees of H.E.H. the Nizam’s Supplemental Family Trust v. CIT32 citing242 ITR 381 · 2000 · SC
- Tata International Ltd. v. DCIT5 citing23 Taxmann.com 18 · 2012
- Union of India v. Baba Banda Singh Bahadur Educational Trust4 citing150 Taxmann.com 40 · 2023 · SC
- CIT v. Sri Magunta Raghava Reddy Charitable Trust3 citing72 Taxmann.com 214 · 2016 · HC
- Karur Kongu Charitable Trust v. ITO3 citing147 Taxmann.com 73 · 2023 · HC
- Smt. Lingammal Ramaraju Shastra Prathistha Trust v. ACIT(E)3 citing168 Taxmann.com 476 · ITAT
Before: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadish
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These four appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the orders all dated 05.04.2024 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC], Delhi for the assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16, 2017-18 and 2018-19. 2. Since, the issues raised in these appeals are simi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026