ITO, ROHTAK vs. SH. RAM KUMAR DUHAN, BAHADURGARH

The learned DR although supported the respective orders of the Assessing Officer, but could not controvert the fact that the tax effect involved in each of these appeals are less than Rs.20,00,000/-

We have heard learned Sr. DR and perused the relevant material on record. It is noticed that recently the CBDT has issued Circular No. 03 of 2018, dated 11th July, 2018 with retrospective effect, revising the monetary limit to Rs.20,00,000/- for not filing appeals before the Tribunal

From the above Circular, it is palpable that the Instruction is applicable to the pending appeals also with retrospective effect and there is a clear-cut direction to the Department to withdraw or not press such appeals filed before the ITAT, wherein tax effect is less than Rs.20,00,000/-. Going by the prescription of the afore-noted Circular, we are of the view that the Revenue should have either not filed the instant appeals before the Tribunal or withdrawn the same as the tax effect in these appeals are admittedly less than the prescribed limit, i.e., Rs. 20,00,000/- for not filing the appeals. Accordingly, we dismiss the all the appeals filed by the Revenue without going into merits of the case. The Cross Objection filed by one of the assessees, which is in support of the respective impugned order, is also dismissed as infructuous. However, the Department is at liberty to file

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and a Cross Objection of the assessee stand dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Court on 31/07/2018 [AMIT SHUKLA] [O.P. KANT] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 31st July, 2018. RK/-