PARIJA CONSTRUCTION CO.(P) LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BHUBANESWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal as the assessee had not made the prayer for reference to the DVO before the AO, and in the interest of justice, the case was restored to the AO for readjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2020-2021. The appeal was initially barred by 13 days, but the delay was condoned. The assessee had purchased a property for Rs. 98,00,000, while the stamp duty value was Rs. 1,17,36,640.
What were the issues?
Whether the issue of property valuation difference should be restored to the AO for readjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
IT Act
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
(नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2020-2021) Parija Construction Co.(P) Ltd. Vs ITO, Ward-1(1), Bhubaneswar Nirmala Plaza, Flat-107, Forest Park, Bhubaneswar PAN No. :AACCP 9612 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Rajeeva Kumar, AR राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 01/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 01/12/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 11.03.2025 for the assessment year 2020-2021.
The appeal of the assessee is barred by 13 days. Though the assessee has not filed any condonation application, however, ld.AR, during the course of hearing requested for condonation of delay. Ld.Sr. DR also did not object to the same. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 13 days and proceed to dispose off the appeal.
It was submitted by the Ld. AR that the assessee had filed its return of income and in the course of assessment, it was noticed that the assessee had purchased a property for a consideration of Rs.98,00,000/-, whereas the stamp value consideration was Rs.1,17,36,640/-. It was 2 submission that the admittedly before the AO though the assesee had objected to the additions, the assessee had not requested the AO to refer the matter to the DVO. It was submission that before the ld.CIT(A) the assessee had requested that the matter be referred to DVO for valuation. It was submission that the Ld.CIT(A) did not consider the submissions of the assesses and has confirmed the addition made by the AO representing the difference between the purchase price as disclosed by the assessee and the stamp value consideration. It was the prayer that the issues in this appeal may be restored to the file of the AO and the assessee would pray before the AO for the reference to the valuation of research.
In reply, the Ld.Sr.DR submitted that he has no objection if the issues are restored to the file of the AO for readjudication after verification by the AO subject to the assessee making the prayer for the same before the AO.
We have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed that the assessee had not made the prayer for reference to valuation DVO before the AO, in the interest of justice, as to grant the assessee adequate opportunity to substantiate its case, the issues in this appeal are restored to the file of the AO for readjudication after granting the assessee adequate opportunity to substantiate its case. Liberty is granted to the assessee to make all such submissions as required before the AO.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Abd Maestro Private Limited vs. Great Galleon Ventures LTDDelhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Jangeer Singh Trading As Jangeer Singh Kabulshah Agriculture Works vs. Yogesh Jangid Trading As Jangid Agro Engineering & Anr.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Rabindranath Behera vs. The Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Dinesh Dash vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S.Ishwar Chandra Barik, Keonjhar vs. Commissioner(Appeal), GST, Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026