ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. ACCENT PHARMA, CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, which instructs officers to withdraw appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 50 lakhs, is binding on the Department. Therefore, the Revenue could not proceed with the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for the assessment year 2013-14. Both the Revenue and the assessee agreed that the tax effect in the appeal was below Rs. 50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the CBDT circular regarding monetary limits for appeals is binding on the Revenue and if the appeal should be dismissed based on the tax effect being below the prescribed limit.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY & SHRI S JAYARAMAN
: Shri Pavitran Kumar, JCIT अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri Prabhakar, C.A ��यथ� क� ओर से /Respondent by : 16.09.2019 सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 16.09.2019 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R
PER SHRI S JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The Revenue filed this appeal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-18, Chennai in dated 21.09.2017 for the assessment year 2013-14.
At the time of hearing, the Ld. DR submitted that the tax effect is below Rs.50 lakhs and hence the Revenue’s appeal would be covered by the CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, fixing the monetary limit of Rs.50 lakhs.
The Ld. AR also submitted that the tax effect involved in the appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs.
On hearing both sides, we find that the tax effect in this case is less than Rs. 50 lakhs. The CBDT in its Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 instructed its officers to withdraw all the appeals pending before the ITAT where the tax effect is less than Rs. 50 lakhs. This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that this circular of CBDT is binding on the officers of the Department. Therefore, the Revenue cannot proceed further in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. 4.
Order pronounced in the open Court after conclusion of hearing on the 16th September, 2019 in Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026