ACIT, CC- 18, NEW DELHI vs. SNEREA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s order lacked detailed reasoning and that the AO's assessment order contained anomalies regarding the nature of income. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the orders and remitted the matter back to the CIT(A).
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s deletion of an addition of Rs. 75 Cr. made by the AO. The AO reopened the assessment based on an MOU suggesting a property transfer disguised as share transfer, estimating the property's market value at Rs. 150 Cr.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition without proper appreciation of facts and whether the AO properly recorded satisfaction for reopening the case and provided adequate opportunity to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Bhaichand H. Gandhi237 citing141 ITR 67 · 1983 · HC
- Smt. Shanta Devi v. CIT51 citing171 ITR 532 · 1988 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR US & SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, AM Since the issues involved in these appeals are identical; hence, these are being heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of brevity. Snerea Properties P. Ltd. Shrey Properties P. ltd.
These appeals for the Assessment Year (hereinafter, the ‘AY’) 2011-12 filed by the Revenue are directed against orders dated 09.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026