M/S. MAS REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1191/KOL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 January 2020AY 2012-132 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the lower authorities passed orders without hearing the assessee due to non-service of notices caused by a change of address. For the ends of justice, the orders were set aside.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeals were against ex-parte orders passed by the CIT(A) and AO. The assessee claimed that notices were not served due to a change of address, preventing them from participating in the proceedings.

What were the issues?

Whether ex-parte assessment and appellate orders are valid when the assessee did not receive notices due to a change of address.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: KOLKATA

Before: Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Dr. (Shri) Arjun Lal Saini, AM ]

Hearing: 04.12.2019Pronounced: 01.01.2020

Heard together (2 matters)

I.TA No. 1191/Kol/2018
I.TA No. 1192/Kol/2018

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Both these appeals preferred by the assessee against the separate orders of Ld. CIT(A) -18, Kolkata dated 21-02-2018 for the assessment year 2012-13.

2.

At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that the impugned orders are ex parte orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A) and that only two notices were issued to the assessee. She also contended that the assessment order passed by the AO is also u/s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It is also noted that the assessee has filed affidavit stating that the notices issued in the course of the assessment and appellate proceedings could not be served on the assessee since the address of the assessee has changed to a new address, which is “493/C/A, G. T. Road (S), Vivek Vihar Shop-4, Shibpur, Kolkata, dist. Howrah-711102”. Hence, no notices could be served upon the assessee’s due to change of address, the assessee could not make any compliance before the lower authorities. Having gone through the impugned appellate order and the assessment order, we note that both the authorities have passed the orders without hearing the assessee. The reason for passing ex-parte order a 1 A.Y 2012-13 Mas Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. & Mas Realcon Pvt. Ltd.. is obvious, i.e. the assessee did not receive the notice, since there was a change of address as noted above. In such a scenario for the ends of justice and fair play, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and remand the matter back to the file of the AO to do de novo assessment and the ld. AR is directed to intimate the change of address provided it had not intimated earlier and thereafter, diligently participate during the assessment proceedings. We direct the AO to frame de-novo assessment after hearing the assessee in accordance with law.

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. 3.

Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 1st January, 2020

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →