ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), CHENNAI vs. SARAVANA GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD., CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue due to low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. The merits of the issue were not commented upon.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The tax effect in the appeal was below Rs. 50 lacs. The assessee did not appear for the hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed by the Revenue with a tax effect below the prescribed limit can be dismissed based on CBDT circulars.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR & SHRI DUVVURU R.L.REDDY
PER RAMIT KOCHAR, Accountant Member:
This appeal filed by Revenue is disposed of because tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.50 lacs as per CBDT Circular No.17/2019 (F.No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt) ) dated 08th August, 2019 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, amending Para No.3 and 5 of the CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 and its subsequent amendment dated 20.08.2018.
The Ld. DR at the outset submitted that tax effect involved in this appeal filed by Revenue is less than Rs.50 lacs and this appeal is covered by CBDT circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 being a low tax effect appeal filed by the Revenue. It is also explained by learned DR that this appeal filed by Revenue is also not hit by any of the exceptions carved out in aforesaid CBDT circular. None appeared on behalf of the assessee when the appeal was called for hearing before the Bench and an application for adjournment is moved by counsels for the assessee requesting for adjournment citing that the counsel who has to argue the case is out of India for some personal work . The said adjournment application is placed on record and it stand rejected because is an Revenue’s appeal who has sought to withdraw the appeal on the ground that it is an low tax effect appeal covered by CBDT circular dated 08.08.2019 and no prejudice is likely to be caused to assessee by dismissal of this appeal even in the absence of the counsels for the assessee.
The tax effect in this appeal filed by Revenue is undisputedly below Rs.50 lacs and thus keeping in view CBDT Circular No.17/2019 (F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt)) dated 08th August, 2019 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, amending Para No.3 and 5 of the CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 1107.2018 and its subsequent amendment dated 20.08.2018, we are inclined to dismiss this appeal filed by Revenue due to low tax effect involved in this appeal which is below Rs.50 lacs. While disposing of this appeal filed by Revenue due to low tax effect vide aforesaid CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, we clarify that we have not commented on the merits of the issue in this appeal. However, at the same time we are granting liberty to Revenue that if at any stage Revenue wants to agitate the matter/issue in this appeal in accordance with the clauses/exceptions as are contained in the afore-stated CBDT circular number 17/2019 dated 08.08.2018 read with CBDT circular No 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 as modified on 20.08.2018, the Revenue is hereby granted liberty to file miscellaneous application praying for recall of this order. We order accordingly.
In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue stand dismissed owing to low tax effect as indicated above. Order pronounced in the open court on 01.10.2019.
आदेश क& घोषणा खुले �यायालय म* +दनांकः 01.10.2019 को क& गई ।
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026