G2K TRUST,TRICHY vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), TRICHY

ITA 3113/CHNY/2025Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 February 2026AY 2017-18Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi (Judicial Member), Shri S.R. Raghunatha (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the death of the auditor, occurring six months before the intimation order, did not constitute a sufficient cause for the inordinate delay in filing the appeal. The assessee failed to demonstrate steps taken to manage its affairs or find an alternative auditor.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals with a significant delay of 2235 and 2175 days respectively for assessment years 2017-18 and 2018-19. The primary reason cited for the delay was the death of the assessee's auditor.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the first appellate authority was sufficiently explained by the death of the auditor, and if the delay should be condoned.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Before: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunatha

Hearing: 02.02.2026Pronounced: 24.02.2026

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

Both the appeals filed by the assessee are directed against separate orders dated 04.07.2025 and 15.07.2025 passed by the Addl/JCIT(A), Panaji for the assessment years 2017-18 and 2018-19 respectively.

2.

We find that the appeal is filed with a delay of 34 days. The assessee filed an affidavit for condonation of delay stating the reasons. Upon hearing both the parties and

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Similar judgments

Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →