SRKREC ALUMNI, ASSOCIATION,BHIMAVARAM vs. CIT (EXEMTION), HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 533/VIZ/2017Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam23 February 20187 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that benefiting a section of the public, such as students of a particular college, qualifies as an object of general public utility. Therefore, the assessee is entitled to registration under Section 12AA.

What were the facts?

The assessee, an alumni association of an engineering college, applied for registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G. The CIT(E) denied these on the grounds that the activities benefited only students of a specific college and not the general public.

What were the issues?

Whether the activities of an alumni association benefiting only students of a specific college constitute an object of general public utility for the purpose of Section 2(15) and thus qualify for registration under Section 12AA.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA,Section 80G,Section 2(15)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM

Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Deba K. Sonawal – CIT DR
Hearing: 08/02/2018

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No. 533 & 534/VIZ/2017

M/s. S.R.K.R.E.C. Alumni vs. CIT (Exemptions), Association, D.No. Z-40, Hyderabad. 1st Floor, General Amenities Building, SRKR Engineering College, China Amiram, Bhimavaram, W.G. District. PAN No. AAOAS 9060 M (Appellant) (Respondent)

Assessee by : Shri G.V.N. Hari – Advocate. Department By : Shri Deba K. Sonawal – CIT DR

Date of hearing : 08/02/2018. Date of pronouncement : 23/02/2018.

O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER

These appeals by the assessee are directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad, dated 26/09/2017. 2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee – M/s. S.R.K.R.E.C. Alumni Association, Bhimavaram is registered under the Societies Registration Act on 07/04/2016 and filed an application in Form Nos. 10A & 10G of the Income Tax Act, 1961

2 ITA No.533 & 534/VIZ/2017 (M/s. S.R.K.R.E.C. Alumni Association)

(hereinafter referred to as 'Act') on 10/03/2017 seeking registration under section 12AA of the Act and also approval under section 80G of the Act with the following objects:- “1. To provide a forum to establish a link between the alumni world-wide. 2. To provide a forum to establish a link between the alumni world-wide, staff and students of SRKREC, Bvrm. 3. To enable the alumni to initiate and actively participate in activities which would contribute to the general development of SRKREC, its staff and students; 4. To institute prizes and scholarships, and render financial aid to deserving students of SRKRBC. 5. To organize and enable the networking and interaction on activities of common interest among alumni of SRKREC. 6. To maintain a benevolent fund to help individual member of alumni in case of distress. 7. To approve/promote establishment of units, chapters in different geographical locations having adequate congregation of alumni members. 8. To do all such things as may be deemed incidental or conducive to the attainment of the foregoing objects.”

3.

The ld. CIT(E) after verifying the objects and activities of the assessee observed that the assessee-society is engaged in providing soft skill training programmes, sponsoring students technical fest and conducting alumni of meets, induction program for fresheners, arranging guest lectures and food coupons to poor students. However, all the beneficiaries of these programmes are from the same college i.e. students of S.R.K.R. Engineering College and these activities are not extended to the students of other colleges. According to the ld. CIT(E), the society is formed

3 ITA No.533 & 534/VIZ/2017 (M/s. S.R.K.R.E.C. Alumni Association)

only to cater to the needs of the students of S.R.K.R. Engineering College only. There is no public utility involved in the activities of the applicant society as per the provisions of section 2(15) of the Act. Accordingly, he denied registration under section 12AA and also rejected 80G. 4. On appeal before us, ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that genuineness of the society and the charitable activities carried out by the assessee, has not been doubted by the ld. CIT(E). The only objection raised by the ld. CIT(E) is that the assessee society is existed only to take care of the students of S.R.K.R. Engineering College and only one section of people are getting benefit and not public at large. It is also submitted that students of S.R.K.R. Engineering College are consisting of various branches of Engineering students and belonging to various districts of Andhra Pradesh and different castes and religion. Therefore, the ld. CIT(E) is not correct in observing that the society is taking care of only a particular class of people is not correct and submitted that 12AA registration may be granted. He relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of Sree Anjaneya Medical Trust vs. CIT [382 ITR 399) (Ker.)]. 5. On the other hand, ld. Departmental Representative has strongly supported the order passed by the ld. CIT(E).

4 ITA No.533 & 534/VIZ/2017 (M/s. S.R.K.R.E.C. Alumni Association)

6.

We have heard both the parties, perused the material available on record and order of the ld. CIT(E). 7. The objects of the assessee - M/s. S.R.K.R.E.C. Alumni Association, Bhimavaram shows that it was started by students of S.R.K.R. Engineering College, Bhimavaram to establish link between the old students and the students, who are studying in the college and also a link between alumni worldwide staff. It is also conducting soft skill training programmes, sponsoring students technical fest and conducting alumni of meets, induction program for fresheners, arranging guest lectures and food coupons to poor students. From the activities carried on by the assessee, it is very clear that the assessee is carrying as per its objects and providing various facilities to the S.R.K.R. Engineering College students. We have no doubt that the assessee is carrying charitable activities. The ld. CIT(E) also not expressed any doubt so far as the activities carried on by the assessee. The only objection raised by the ld. CIT(E) is the activities of the assessee society is only to the benefit of the students of S.R.K.R. Engineering College and not for other college students. In our opinion, the S.R.K.R. Engineering College students are consisting of students belonging to various parts of the State and also belonging to the different religion and different castes. In our

5 ITA No.533 & 534/VIZ/2017 (M/s. S.R.K.R.E.C. Alumni Association)

opinion, it is not necessary that the assessee society has to carry its activities to all the students of Bhimavaram, who are studying in various colleges. If the assessee is carrying its charitable activities irrespective of caste, creed, the assessee is entitled for benefit of section 12AA of the Act. 8. Under similar circumstances, the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association vs. CIT (82 ITR 704) has held that an object beneficial to a section of the public is an object of general public utility. To serve a charitable purpose it is not necessary that the object should be to benefit the whole of mankind or all persons in a particular country or State. It is sufficient if the intention to benefit a section of the public as distinguished from a specified individual is present. 9. The Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Andhra Pradesh Police Welfare Society [148 ITR 287 (AP)] has considered the object of general public utility and observed that the expression “object of general public utility” in section 2(15) of the Act is not restricted to objects beneficial to the whole of mankind. An object beneficial to a section of the public is an object of general public utility. To serve a charitable purpose, it is not necessary that the object should be to benefit the whole of mankind or even all persons living in a particular country or

6 ITA No.533 & 534/VIZ/2017 (M/s. S.R.K.R.E.C. Alumni Association)

province. In the present case, the objects of the assessee society show that society is existed solely for the benefit of the entire students of S.R.K.R. Engineering College and its staff. Therefore, even if the benefits are restricted to the College and staff, the assessee is entitled to benefit of section 12AA as per the judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court as well as the Jurisdictional High Court as referred to supra. 10. Keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and also by following the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association (supra) and also the judgment of Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Andhra Pradesh Police Welfare Society (supra), we hold that assessee is entitled for registration under section 12AA of the Act. Accordingly, we direct the ld. CIT(E) to grant registration as requested by the assessee society in terms of section 12A of the Act. 11. So far as 80G is concerned, the ld. CIT(E) is directed to consider the assessee society for approval under section 80G after granting registration under section 12A as per law after giving opportunity to the assessee.

7 ITA No.533 & 534/VIZ/2017 (M/s. S.R.K.R.E.C. Alumni Association)

12.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No. 533/VIZ/2017 is allowed and ITA No. 534/VIZ/2017 is allowed for statistical purposes. Order Pronounced in open Court on this 23rd day of Feb., 2018.

Sd/- sd/- (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) (V. DURGA RAO) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated : 23rd February, 2018. vr/- Copy to: 1. The Assessee - M/s. S.R.K.R.E.C. Alumni Association, D.No. Z-40, 1st Floor, General Amenities Building, SRKR Engineering College, China Amiram, Bhimavaram, W.G. District. 2. The Revenue – CIT (Exemptions), Hyderabad. 3. The D.R., Visakhapatnam. 4. Guard file. By order

(VUKKEM RAMBABU) Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Visakhapatnam.

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →