PARULBEN JAYENDRA PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(3)(4), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the assessee's application for withdrawal under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to seek restoration if the scheme benefits are not availed for bonafide reasons.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' and received a certificate. The assessee then filed an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee upon opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV
आदेश/O R D E R
The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-13, Ahmedabad dated 28th June 2019 passed for Assessment Year 2009-10.
At the time of hearing before us, none appeared on behalf the 2. assessee. However, vide application dated 8th December 2021, the assessee submitted that he has opted to avail the benefits of “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020” and also submitted that has received Certificate in Form No.3 from Designated Authority under Section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Copy of the Form No.3 is placed on record before the Tribunal in this regard. An application dated 08.12.2021 requesting for withdrawal of appeal under the said scheme is also placed on record.
The learned Departmental Representative, on the other hand, submitted that he has no objection to the withdrawal of appeal in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
Parulben Jayendra Patel Vs. ITO AY : 2009-10 2
I have considered the submission and application of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal under the scheme “Vivad se Vishwas”. In the light of aforesaid request made by the assessee, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of Vivad se Vishwas Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the Court on 7th January 2022 at Ahmedabad.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026