INCOME TAX OFFICER, SALEM vs. IDAPADI MUNICIPALITY, SALEM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the revenue's appeals were not maintainable due to low tax effect, as per a CBDT circular setting a monetary limit of Rs. 60 lakhs for filing appeals. The tax effect in this case was below the stipulated limit for all assessment years.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by the revenue against orders of the CIT(A) concerning assessment years 2019-20 to 2022-23. The issue involved the assessee's failure to deduct TDS on interest paid to TUFIDCO. The AO treated the assessee as being in default, but the CIT(A) deleted the addition.
What were the issues?
Whether the revenue's appeals are maintainable considering the low tax effect, based on CBDT guidelines.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 194A,Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 194A(3)(iii)(f),Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & MS. PADMAVATHY.S
PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M: These appeals by the revenue are against separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, (in short "CIT(A)") passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") all dated 08.10.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2019-20 to 2022-23. The impugned order is emanating from the order passed u/s.201(1)/(1A) passed by
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194A
- S R P Jutha 13 Rajkot VI and Gr S Ma, Rajkot vs ITO WD 1(2)(1) Rajkot, RajkotITA 951/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Welspun Aunta Simaria Project Private… vs DCIT, Circle-78(1), DelhiITA 6559/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Lakhmanbhai Maru, Vadodara vs ITO, Ward 1(2)(1), Vadodara, Aayakar…ITA 1046/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Hexad Infosoft Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 1713/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Hexad Infosoft Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 1712/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026