CHERAN TEXTILE WIND FARM PVT LTD,TIRUPUR vs. ITO, WARD 1(2), TIRUPUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the tax due was paid before the return was filed and was not less than the tax payable on the returned income, the levy of interest under Sections 234A and 234B was not justified. The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Pranoy Roy.
What were the facts?
The assessees paid their taxes after the due date but before filing their income tax returns. The CPC levied interest under Sections 234A and 234B, which the CIT(A) upheld. The assessees appealed this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether interest under Section 234A and 234B is leviable when tax is paid after the due date but before filing the return of income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Pranoy Roy42 citing179 Taxmann 53 · 2009 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per contra, the ld.DR supported the orders of the lower authorities.
We heard the rival submissions and gone through the Hon’ble Apex Court’s decision cited supra. Since the tax due had already been paid which was not less than the tax payable on the returned income which was accepted, the question of levy of interest does not arise. Therefore, we find merit in the appeals of the assessees and hence allow the appeals.
In the result, both the assessees appeals are allowed.
More judgments on Section 234A
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sarvjeet Singh Through Legal Heir Manjit… vs ITO Ward 1(1), AlwarITA 355/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026