CAMS INVESTOR SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CORP CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's AR requested withdrawal of the appeal as no grievance remained. The Ld.DR did not object. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's plea to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2018-19. The assessee, through their AR, stated that due to interim directions, the AO granted relief regarding the computation of income and book profit. Therefore, there was no grievance surviving for adjudication.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to settlement of grievance with the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
1. This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld.CIT(A)‘), Delhi, dated 06.02.2024 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as ‘AY‘) 2018-19.
At the outset, the Ld.AR of the assessee brought to our notice that pursuant to the interim directions given by the Tribunal, the AO has given relief to the assessee [relating to the normal computation of income as (AY 2018-19) M/s. CAMS Investor Services Pvt. Ltd. :: 2 ::
well as in computing of book profit u/s.115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act‘)]and hence assessee has filed letter dated 24.02.2026 stating that there is no grievance surviving for adjudication in this Appeal. In such circumstances, therefore, the assessee impliedly pleads for withdrawal of the appeal.
The Ld.DR doesn’t object.
By considering the aforesaid submissions and the plea of the assessee that there is no grievance surviving for adjudication in the present appeal, we allow the plea of assessee to withdraw this Appeal.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on the 04th day of March, 2026, in Chennai.
More judgments on Section 115JB
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 1076/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026