CAMS INVESTOR SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CORP CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 887/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 March 2026AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY (Judicial Member), SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The assessee's AR requested withdrawal of the appeal as no grievance remained. The Ld.DR did not object. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's plea to withdraw the appeal.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2018-19. The assessee, through their AR, stated that due to interim directions, the AO granted relief regarding the computation of income and book profit. Therefore, there was no grievance surviving for adjudication.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to settlement of grievance with the AO.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 115JB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO

Hearing: 24.02.2025Pronounced: 04.03.2026

आदेश / O R D E R

PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:

1.

1. This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld.CIT(A)‘), Delhi, dated 06.02.2024 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as ‘AY‘) 2018-19.

2.

At the outset, the Ld.AR of the assessee brought to our notice that pursuant to the interim directions given by the Tribunal, the AO has given relief to the assessee [relating to the normal computation of income as (AY 2018-19) M/s. CAMS Investor Services Pvt. Ltd. :: 2 ::

1.

well as in computing of book profit u/s.115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act‘)]and hence assessee has filed letter dated 24.02.2026 stating that there is no grievance surviving for adjudication in this Appeal. In such circumstances, therefore, the assessee impliedly pleads for withdrawal of the appeal.

3.

The Ld.DR doesn’t object.

4.

By considering the aforesaid submissions and the plea of the assessee that there is no grievance surviving for adjudication in the present appeal, we allow the plea of assessee to withdraw this Appeal.

5.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced on the 04th day of March, 2026, in Chennai.

More judgments on Section 115JB

All 5,494 judgments and leading authorities on Section 115JB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →