OASIS ENTERPRISES,VADODARA vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VADODARA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal as per the provisions of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration if the scheme benefits were not availed for bonafide reasons.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 scheme. The assessee then sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA
आदेश/O R D E R
PER MADHUMITA ROY, JM:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Ahmedabad (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 28.08.2018 arising in the assessment order dated 07.03.2017 passed by the DCIT, Central Cirlce-1, Baroda under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 142A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2014-15.
When the matter was called for hearing, it is pointed out to the Bench that the assessee has filed declaration and undertaking in Form No. 1 as per provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for availment of the benefit under the scheme. In view of this, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee does not want to pursue the said appeal owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and it has complied with the requisite formalities, and sought permission for withdrawal of appeal before the Tribunal. The Ld. Counsel has placed on record copy of Form No. 1 and 2.
The Ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
In the light of written requests made on behalf of the captioned party, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the captioned appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. This Order pronounced on 24/01/2022
More judgments on Section 142A
- Zabuben Mepabhai Bharvad, Ahmedabad vs The PCIT - 1, AhmedabadITA 1233/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinit Arvind Shah, Jamnagar vs ACIT Cir - 1, JamnagarITA 507/RJT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Pradeep H. Raheja, Mumbai vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA 7740/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Slimtile Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxSCA/13575/20233 Sept 2026
- Yuley Tannery, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 33(1), KolkataITA 1598/KOL/2026[2018-2019]Status: Heard3 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026