SOPRA STERIA GROUP,NOIDA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2), INT. TAX., NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn based on the assessee's decision to opt for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to recall the order if the scheme was unsuccessful.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the orders of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax for assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17. The assessee had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of appeals due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘D’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
ORDER PER BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, AM,
These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1)(2) (in short ‘the AO’) dated 09.10.2018 and 26.09.2019 passed u/s 143(3)/144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) pertaining to Assessment Years 2015-16 and 2016-17, respectively.
When these appeals were called for hearing, ld. Counsel for the assessee requested for withdrawal of the appeals on the ground that the assessee has opted for The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 for the relevant assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17.
Since the assessee has opted for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, we dismiss these appeals as withdrawn. However, we are granting liberty to the assessee that in case the assessee is not successful in getting through the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, it is free to get this order recalled. In terms of the above, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 6th February, 2025.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026