GOLDEN FLAME STEELS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2131/DEL/2013Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 September 2018AY 2000-014 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer. The AO was directed to dispose of the assessee's objections regarding the initiation of reassessment proceedings by passing a speaking order.

What were the facts?

The assessee objected to the initiation of reassessment proceedings before the Assessing Officer (AO). The AO did not dispose of these objections by passing a speaking order. The CIT(A) also failed to adjudicate this issue.

What were the issues?

Whether the reassessment proceedings are valid when the Assessing Officer fails to pass a speaking order on the assessee's objections against the initiation of such proceedings.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 147,Section 148

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI N.K.BILLAIYA & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Appellant: Shri Ruchesh Sinha, Adv
For Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR
Hearing: 18.06.2018Pronounced: 14.09.2018

PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER :

1.

This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 13.02.2013 passed by the ld. CIT(A)-VIII, New Delhi for assessment year 2000-01. The appeal is against the action of the ld. CIT(A) in upholding the reassessment proceedings completed u/s 144/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act").

2.

At the outset, the ld. AR submitted that the assessee had objected to the initiation of the reassessment proceedings before the Assessing Officer but the Assessing Officer had not disposed of the objections raised by the assessee in this regard. He drew our attention to the reply filed by the assessee before the Assessing Officer in response to the notice issued u/s 148 of the Act and submitted that the Assessing Officer had not passed a speaking order on the objections raised by the assessee. It was further submitted that the ld. CIT(A) had also not adjudicated this issue which was raised specifically before the ld. CIT(A) in the grounds of appeal. He drew our attention to page 2 of the impugned order wherein this ground was specifically raised before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. AR submitted that non-disposal of the objections by passing a speaking order by the Assessing Officer was a clear violation of the directions of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. vs ITO (2003)

259 ITR (SC) and it made the reassessment illegal and invalid.

On an inquiry from the Bench, the ld. AR had no objection to the file being restored to the office of the Assessing Officer with a direction to dispose of the objections of the assessee against reassessment proceedings. Ld. Sr. DR also had no objection if the Assessing Officer was directed to dispose of the objections of the assessee against the reassessment proceedings by passing a speaking order.

3.

Accordingly, in view of the agreement of both the parties, we restore the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer with the direction to dispose of the objections of the assessee with regard to initiation of reassessment proceedings by passing a speaking order.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 14th September, 2018.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →