ITO, WARD- 32(4), NEW DELHI vs. DHIRAJ JAIN, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2762/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 September 2018AY 2013-142 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable due to the low tax effect. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). The tax effect of the appeal was below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT for filing appeals.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable before the ITAT when the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

CBDT Circular No. 03/2008

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC” NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA

For Appellant: Shri C.P. Singh, Sr.D.R

The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 06.02.2018 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), New Delhi.

2.

Admittedly, the total income assessed by the Assessing Officer is Rs.19,96,393/- on which tax effect is much below the new prescribed monetary limit for filing of appeal by the Department before the ITAT of Rs.20 lac vide CBDT Circular No. 03/2008 [F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt)] dated 11th July, 2018. Accordingly, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as non maintainable because of low tax effect.

3.

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 19th September, 2018.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →