M/S. ACTIVE ENGINERS,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(3), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's intention to withdraw the appeal due to availing the VSV Scheme. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a penalty order. During the hearing, it was brought to the Tribunal's notice that the assessee had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn as the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “c” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश/O R D E R
PER MADHUMITA ROY, JM:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Ahmedabad (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 31.01.2019 arising in the penalty order dated 20.06.2018 passed by the ACIT, Cirlce-3(3), Ahmedabad under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2015-16.
When the matter was called for hearing, it is pointed out to the Bench that the assessee has filed declaration and undertaking in Form No. 1 as per provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for availment of the benefit under the scheme. In view of this, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee does not want to pursue the said appeal owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and it has complied with the requisite formalities, and sought permission for withdrawal of appeal before the Tribunal. The Ld. Counsel has placed on record copy of Form No. 1 and 2.
The Ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
In the light of written requests made on behalf of the captioned party, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the captioned appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. This Order pronounced on 27/01/2022
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026