ITO, WARD- 2(3), NOIDA vs. NEHA GUPTA, NOIDA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3468/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 October 2018AY 2009-102 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the tax effect of the appeal was below the prescribed monetary limit for filing appeals by the Department. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). The Assessing Officer had assessed the total income at Rs. 25,54,125/-.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal before the ITAT due to low tax effect, as per CBDT circulars.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Not Applicable

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC” NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA

For Appellant: Shri Surender Pal, Sr.D.R
For Respondent: Shri Ankit Gupta, Adv

The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 25.09.2017 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, NOIDA.

2.

Admittedly, the total income assessed by the Assessing Officer is Rs.25,54,125/- on which tax effect is much below the new prescribed monetary limit for filing of appeal by the Department before the ITAT of Rs.20 lac vide CBDT Circular No. 03/2008 [F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt)] dated 11th July, 2018. Accordingly, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as non maintainable because of low tax effect.

3.

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 1st October, 2018.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →