NOKHA TRADING LLP,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the dividend income received by the assessee from mutual funds and shares was fully exempt under Sections 10(34) and 10(35) of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) was incorrect, and the deduction under Section 115BBDA was not applicable as the dividend income was not chargeable to tax.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Nokha Trading LLP, filed its return of income for AY 2018-19. The Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment but in the computation sheet, a difference arose in the business income. The AO treated dividend income, which was claimed as exempt by the assessee under Sections 10(34) and 10(35), as taxable business income and made an addition.
What were the issues?
Whether dividend income, claimed as exempt under Sections 10(34) and 10(35), could be treated as taxable business income by the AO and whether the consequential addition and deduction under Section 115BBDA were valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 10(34),Section 10(35),Section 115BBDA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
Per Prashant Maharishi, Vice President
This appeal is filed by Nokha Trading LLP (the assessee/appellant) for the assessment year 2018-19 against the appellate order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) [ld. CIT(A)] dated 19.8.2025 wherein the appeal filed by the assessee against the assessment order dated 21.6.2021 passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] by the National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi [ld. AO] was dismissed.
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :-
“ 1. General Grounds
The National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi (`A0') h
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026