CORPORATE WORLDWISE STAY LLP,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIRCLE -20(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the characterization of transactions, the FAR profile, and the selection of the Profit Split Method were not conclusively examined. Therefore, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer for de novo adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a limited liability partnership, provides tour booking services and works with an associated enterprise in Mauritius. The tax authorities treated reimbursements from the associated enterprise as an international transaction and made an upward adjustment, which was partly confirmed by the DRP.
What were the issues?
Whether reimbursements from an associated enterprise constitute an international transaction, and the appropriateness of the Profit Split Method for determining arm's length price.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE
Per: Shri Anikesh Banerjee, JM: The instant appeal of the assessee filed against the order of the Assessment Unit, Income-tax Department [in short, Ld.AO’) passed under section 143(3) read with section 144C(13) read with section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’), date of order 19/09/2024. The impugned order was originated from the recommendation of the Ld. CIT (DRP)- 1, Mumbai, passed u/s 144C(5) of the Act, date of order 16/09/2024. 2 Corporate Worldwide Stay LLP
The assessee has taken the following grounds:- “GROUNDS OF APPEAL
Objection agai
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92
- Prometric Testing Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon vs DCIT, GurgaonITA 3563/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2009-10
- Freyr Software Services Private Limited… vs DCIT, Circle-8(1), HyderabadITTPA 345/HYD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Yashwant Hiralal Thakar, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer- 22(3)(1), MumbaiITA 366/MUM/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2012-13
- Denso Haryana Private Limited, New Delhi vs JCIT, Special Range 3, New DelhiITA 1250/DEL/2023[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Jul 2026AY 2013-14
- Denso Haryana Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs Addl.CIT, Special Range- 3, New DelhiITA 6690/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Jul 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026