CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (KULA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee, a cooperative bank, was obligated to deduct tax at source on interest paid to cooperative societies that were not members, as specific provisions override general exemptions. The assessee's claim of exemption under Section 194A(3)(v) was rejected.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a multi-state cooperative bank, failed to deduct TDS on interest paid to other cooperative societies. The Assessing Officer held that the assessee, being a cooperative bank, was not exempt from TDS provisions under Section 194A.
What were the issues?
Whether a cooperative bank is required to deduct TDS on interest paid to other cooperative societies, and if exemptions under Section 194A(3)(v) apply to cooperative banks.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Bank Ltd. (supra), Saraswat Co-op. Bank Ltd. v. ITO (TDS)76 citing54 Taxmann.com 297 · 2015
- (i) HP State Co-op. Bank Ltd. v. ITO(TDS)66 citing172 Taxmann.com 470
- Trib.), and Noida Commercial Co-op. Bank Ltd. v. ITO(TDS)66 citing64 Taxmann.com 158 · 2015
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH
PER BENCH: These 66 appeals filed by the assessee emanate from the orders passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘Act') by the Addl./JCIT (A) – 10, Delhi, Office of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), dated 05.09.2025 [in short, ‘CIT(A)'] for the assessment years (AYs) 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20. Since the issues in these appeal are similar except variance in amounts, therefore, with consent of both parties, these appeals were heard together and are disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. ITA No.6038/M/2025 for AY 2016-17 is
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194A
- S R P Jutha 13 Rajkot VI and Gr S Ma, Rajkot vs ITO WD 1(2)(1) Rajkot, RajkotITA 951/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Welspun Aunta Simaria Project Private… vs DCIT, Circle-78(1), DelhiITA 6559/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Lakhmanbhai Maru, Vadodara vs ITO, Ward 1(2)(1), Vadodara, Aayakar…ITA 1046/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Hexad Infosoft Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 1713/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Hexad Infosoft Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 1712/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026