JHAVERBHAI PATEL RESERCH CENTRE ,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the 38-day delay in filing the application, citing a liberal approach to delay condonation. It further held that scholarship payments made in Indian Rupees within India to Indian residents for higher education abroad do not amount to expenditure incurred outside India, following established precedents. Therefore, there was no violation of Section 11(1)(c) on this ground.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for registration under Section 12AB was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) primarily on grounds of a delay in filing after amending trust deed objects and for allegedly violating Section 11(1)(c) by incurring expenditure outside India for scholarships. The assessee argued that the delay was due to the receipt of the Charity Commissioner's order and that scholarship payments made in Indian Rupees within India, even for studies abroad, do not constitute expenditure outside India.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the application for registration under Section 12AB is condonable and whether scholarship payments made in India for foreign studies constitute expenditure incurred outside India violating Section 11(1)(c).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12AB,Section 11(1)(c),Section 11,Section 12A(1)(ac)(v),Section 119(2)(b)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM
Per Arun Khodpia, AM: The instant appeal is filed by the assessee, challenging the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) [for short “ld. CIT(E)”] dated 27.09.2025, rejecting the application of assessee in Form 10AB for grant of registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under: 1. “On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) has erred in rejecting the application seeking amendment t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026