DCIT (TDS), JAIPUR vs. NATIONAL SOCIETY OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, JAIPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 892/JPR/2016Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur17 April 2017AY 1012-134 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee was not liable for TDS deduction on payments made to RIICO for lease rent, following its own previous decisions and CBDT circulars. The order of the CIT(A) was affirmed.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer treated the assessee in default for not deducting TDS on lease rent paid to RIICO. The CIT(A) partly allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the demand raised under sections 201(1) and 201(1A). The Revenue appealed this decision.

What were the issues?

Whether TDS is deductible under Section 194I on lease rent paid to RIICO. Whether the assessee was in default for failing to deduct TDS.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 194I,Section 201(1),Section 201(1A)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR

Before: SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM & SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 892/JP/2016

For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by :, Shri Manish Aggarwal (CA)

PER SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM.

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of ld. CIT (A)-III,

Jaipur, Rajasthan, dated 27.07.2016 pertaining to A.Y. 2012-13. The Revenue has

raised the following grounds of appeal :-

“1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in holding that the assesee is not required to deduct TDS u/s 1941 of the IT Acct, 1961 on payment to RIICO on account of lease rent.

2.

Further, the ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in relying on the decision in the case of M/s Gupta Fabtex Pvt. Ltd. vide ITA No. 647 & 648/JP/2013, as, the department has not accepted that decision on merits, however, keeping in view the tax effect as below the prescribed limit no further appeal has filed.”

2 ITA No. 892/JP/2016 M/s National Society for Engineering Research& Development.

2.

Briefly stated the facts are that the Assessing Officer carried out a spot

verification on 31/10/2012 for the purpose of TDS verification at the office premises

of the assessee. On verification of the accounts of the society it was noticed by the

Assessing Officer that the assessee did not deduct tax on the amount paid to RIICO.

Therefore, he treated the assessee in default and computed tax liability and interest

their on u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act.

Aggrieved by this, the assessee preferred an appeal before ld. CIT(A), who after

considering the submissions partly allowed the appeal. Thereby, the demand raised

u/s 201(1) and section 201(1A) of the Act was deleted. Now, the revenue is in

appeal.

3.

At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the issue is

covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Hon’ble Tribunal rendered in

the case of M/s Tijaria Polypipes Ltd. Vs. DCIT in ITA No. 14 & 22/JP/2014 dated

30/05/2016 and in the case of M/s Gupta Fabtex Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT in ITA No. 647 &

648/JP/2013 dated 16/12/2015. The ld. Counsel for the assessee also placed

reliance on the circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes No. 35/2016

dated 13/10/2016 in support of the contention that no tax is required to be

deducted on such payments. Ld. Departmental Representative submitted that

although the issue has been decided by this Hon’ble Tribunal against the Revenue.

The Revenue has not filed an appeal on the basis that, tax effect was less than the

monetary limit prescribed in this behalf. Therefore, the Revenue is contesting this

issue on merit. He submitted that the ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciated that the

assessee was required to deduct tax.

3 ITA No. 892/JP/2016 M/s National Society for Engineering Research& Development.

4.

We have heard the rival contentions, perused the material available on record

and gone through the order of the authorities below. The Co-ordinate Bench in the

case of M/s Gupta Fabtex Pvt. Ltd.(supra), under the identical facts, after

considering the submissions and following the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench

held that the assessee was not liable for deduction of tax on the payment made to

the RIICO. This decision of the Tribunal is following by the Co-ordinate Bench in the

case of M/s Tijaria Polypipes Ltd. Vs. DCIT(supra). The Revenue has not brought to

our notice any contrary binding precedents by the jurisdictional High Court in the

Hon’ble Supreme Court. Therefore, taking a consistent view, we do not see any

reason to interfere into the order of the ld. CIT(A), same is hereby affirmed. Thus,

the Grounds raised in the Revenue’s appeal are rejected.

5.

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No. 892/JP/2016 is dismissed.

Order is pronounced in the open court on Monday ,the 17th day of April 2017.

Sd/- Sd/- ( HkkxpUn ½ ( dqy Hkkjr) ( BHAGCHAND) ( KUL BHARAT ) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Jaipur Dated:- 17 /04/2017. Pooja/

आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेषित@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू

1.

The Appellant- Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, (TDS), Jaipur. 2. The Respondent – M/s National Society for Engineering Research & Development, Jaipur. 3. The CIT(A). 4. The CIT,

4 ITA No. 892/JP/2016 M/s National Society for Engineering Research& Development.

5.

The DR, ITAT, Jaipur 6. Guard File (ITA No. 892/JP/2016)

vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,

सहायक पंजीकार@ Aेेपेजंदज. त्महपेजतंत

More judgments on Section 194I

All 477 judgments and leading authorities on Section 194I →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →