TOUGHCONS REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(4)), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee's appeals were filed with a delay, which was condoned. For AY 2018-19, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. For AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18, the Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had passed orders ex-parte without giving adequate opportunity to the assessee. Therefore, the matters were remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee has filed three appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for AYs 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2018-19. The appeals relate to additions made by the AO based on extrapolation of on-money receipts and estimated profit rates for redevelopment projects. One appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, while the other two were remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the issues?
Whether the additions made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) were based on proper evidence and natural justice, and whether the appeals were correctly dismissed ex-parte without proper opportunity to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These three appeals filed by the assessee are against the orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), Mumbai, vide order nos.: i) ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1067888129(1), dated 22.08.2024, passed against the assessment order by ACIT, Central Circle 4(4), Mumbai, u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income-tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), dated 31.12.2019 for Assessment Year 2016-17. ii) ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1067888242(1), dated 22.08.2024, passed against the assessment order by ACIT, AYs 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19
Central Circle 4(4), Mumbai, u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Act,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026