HEMANT DAHYALAL BHATT ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 6(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
For assessment years 2012-13 to 2016-17, additions were made without any nexus to incriminating material found during the search and were based on re-examination of already disclosed particulars. Therefore, these additions were deleted and appeals were allowed. For assessment years 2017-18 and 2018-19, due to circumstances beyond the assessee's control preventing participation, the matters were restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against orders related to assessments under section 153A for assessment years 2012-13 to 2018-19. The assessee argued that for assessment years 2012-13 to 2016-17, the assessments were unabated and no additions could be made without incriminating material. For assessment years 2017-18 and 2018-19, the assessee claimed inability to participate due to prolonged incarceration.
What were the issues?
Whether additions made in unabated assessments under section 153A are valid without incriminating material, and whether proceedings completed ex parte due to circumstances beyond assessee's control warrant restoration to the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10(14)(ii),Section 153A,Section 144,Section 132,Section 24(a)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.2,379 citing149 Taxmann.com 399 · 2023 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘E’ BENCH
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
PER BENCH: These appeals have been filed by the assessee against separate orders passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-54, Mumbai, all dated 30.09.2025, arising out of assessments framed under section 153A read with section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for assessment years 2012–13 to 2018–19. Since the underlying search action, factual substratum, nature of additions, and legal issues involved are common and interconnected, these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by way of this consolidated order, so as to ensure uniformity of reasoning, judicial consistency, and avoid
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026