THE ACIT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM vs. THE JAMPETA CO-OP URBAN BANK LTD, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that as per CBDT circular No. 21/2015, appeals with a tax effect below Rs.10 lakhs are not maintainable. Therefore, the appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2011-12 and 2008-09. The assessee submitted that the tax effect was below Rs.10 lakhs.
What were the issues?
The maintainability of revenue appeals based on the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH
आदेश / O R D E R
PER V. DURGA RAO, Judicial Member:
These appeals filed by the revenue are directed against orders of
the CIT(A)-2, Guntur vide Appeal No.052/2013-14 dated 6.1.2017 &
009/2011-12 dated 5.12.2016 for the assessment years 2011-12 &
2008-09 respectively.
ITA No.168&194 /Vizag/2017 The Jampeta Co-op. Urban Bank Ltd, Rajamahendravaram
When these appeals are taken up for hearing, the Ld. Counsel for
the assessee has submitted that the tax effect involved in these appeals
is below Rs.10 lakhs. As per the circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015
of CBDT being retrospective in nature, the appeals filed by the revenue
are not maintainable. The Ld. D.R. relied on the grounds of appeals. In
view of the above, the appeals filed by the revenue are not
maintainable. Hence, the same are dismissed.
In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed.
The above order was pronounced in the open court on 6th Apr’18.
Sd/- Sd/- ( ड.एस. . . . सु�दर "संह) (वी. दुगा�राव) (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) (V. DURGA RAO) लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �या�यक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER #वशाखापटणम /Visakhapatnam: 'दनांक /Dated :06.04.2018 VG/SPS आदेश क� ��त)ल#प अ*े#षत/Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant – The ACIT, Circle-1(1), Rajamahendravaram 2. ��याथ� / The Respondent – The Jampeta Co-op. Urban Bank Ltd., D.No.46A, 28-28-34, Jampeta, Rajamahendravaram. 3. आयकर आयु+त / The Principal CIT, Rajahmundry 4. आयकर आयु+त (अपील) / The CIT (A)-2, Guntur 5. #वभागीय ��त�न.ध, आय कर अपील�य अ.धकरण, #वशाखापटणम / DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam 6. गाड� फ़ाईल / Guard file आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER // True Copy // Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026