SIRAJ EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST vs. C.I.T.(EXEMPTION),

PDF · subscribers
ITA 29/PAT/2016Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 March 20183 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(Exemptions) did not provide specific material to substantiate the rejection. Therefore, the case was set aside and remanded back to the CIT(Exemptions) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Siraj Educational and Charitable Trust, applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application, stating that the assessee failed to establish the genuineness and alignment of its activities with its aims and objects.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemptions) was justified in rejecting the application for registration under Section 12AA without providing specific evidence of non-genuine or misaligned activities.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH, PATNA

For Respondent: Smt. Archana Sinha, Sr. S.C
Hearing: 08.03.2018Pronounced: 08.03.2018

Per N. K. Saini, AM: This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 05.02.2016 of ld. CIT(Exemptions), Patna.

2.

The only grievance of the assessee in this appeal relates to the rejection of application for grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the ld. CIT(E), Patna.

3.

Facts of the case in brief are that the assessee filed an application in Form No. 10A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 for registration u/s 12AA of the Act on 28.09.2015. The ld. CIT(E) asked the assessee to furnish certain documents/papers. In response, the assessee furnished the requisite papers/documents on 17.02.2016. However, the ld. CIT(E) rejected the application moved by the assessee for grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Act Siraj Educational and Charitable Trust by observing that the accompanying papers/documents revealed that the assessee failed to establish that the activities of the assessee society were according to its aims & objects and that its activities were genuine.

4.

Now the assessee is in appeal. The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the ld. CIT(E) without specifying any particular items which was not in accordance with the aims & objects of the assessee society, was not justified in rejecting the application filed by the assessee for grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Act.

5.

In her rival submissions, the ld. Sr. Standing Counsel for the department supported the impugned order passed by the ld. CIT(E).

6.

We have considered the submissions of both the parties and carefully gone through the material available on the record. In the present case, it is noticed that the ld. CIT(E) rejected the application of the assessee by observing that the papers/documents furnished by the assessee failed to establish that the activities were genuine and according to aims & objects of the assessee society. However, he has not brought any material on record to substantiate that how and in what manner the activities were not genuine or were not in accordance with the aims & objects of the assessee society. We, therefore, deem it appropriate to set aside this issue back to the file of the ld. CIT(E) to be adjudicated afresh in accordance with law after providing due and reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee and by considering all the documents furnished by the assessee.

Siraj Educational and Charitable Trust

7.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. (Order Pronounced in the Court on 08/03/2018) (Amit Shukla) (N. K. Saini) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 08/03/2018 *Subodh*

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →