SANDAPINI GURUKUL FOUNDATION vs. C.I.T.(EXEMPTION),
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT's observation was factually incorrect as a dissolution clause was present in the trust deed. The issue of registration was restored to the CIT for reconsideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Sandapini Gurukul, applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application, stating the trust deed lacked a dissolution clause.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT erred in rejecting the registration application based on a misconception of the trust deed's contents regarding a dissolution clause.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PATNA BENCH, PATNA Before Sh. N_ K Saini; AM and Sh: Sudhanshu Srivastava, JM ITA No. 76/Pat./2016, Asstt: Year Sandapini Gurukul Vs Commissioner of Income Tax Foundation TRUC Complex At (Exemptions), Patna (Bihar) &PO Tilothu: (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AACTG5017F Assessee by :Shri Shikesh Jha Adv. Revenue by Smt Archana Sinha, Sr: S.C: Date of Hearing 14.03.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 15 .03.2018 ORDER Per Sudhanshu Srivastava_JM: This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against order dated 29.03.2016, passed by the Ld. CIT (Exemptions)- Patna wherein, vide the impugned order passed u/s 12AA of the Income-tax Act; 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") , the Ld_ CIT (E) has rejected the assessee' S application for registration u/s 12AA of the Act. 2 The Ld_ AR submitted that the Ld_ CIT (E) has refused grant of registration on the ground that there was n0 dissolution clause in the Trust Deed. It was submitted that this observation of the Ld_ CIT (E) was 2 ITA No. 76/Pat./2016 factually incorrect as the dissolution clause had been duly incorporated in Para 7.3 of the Trust Deed. Our attention was drawn to the relevant Para on page 9 of the Trust Deed in this regard_ It was submitted that in view of the factual inaccuracy in the order to the Ld_ CIT (E) the assessee should be granted registration u / s 12AA. 3 In response, the Ld_ Sr . Standing Counsel for the Department placed reliance on the order of the Ld: CIT (E). 4_ We have heard the rival submissions and have also perused the material on record. We find that the contention of the Ld. AR that the Trust Deed has a dissolution clause is correct and, therefore, we find that the observation of the Ld CIT (E) in this regard is factually incorrect and he has denied registration to the assessee's trust on misconception of facts_ Accordingly, we restore the issue of registration to the file of the Ld: CIT (E) with the direction to reconsider the application of the assessee after taking note of the dissolution clause as contained in Para 7.3 of the trust deed. 3 ITA No. 76/Pat /2016 5 In the result; the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes: (Order Pronounced in the Court on 15/03/2018) / - N.K Saini) - (Sudhanshu Srivastava) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 15 /03/2018 S.sinha*
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026