AKHILESHWARI SEVA TRUST,PATNA vs. C.I.T.-EXEMPTION, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that at the stage of granting registration under Section 12AA, the CIT(Exemptions) should only examine if the objects of the trust are charitable, not the genuineness of its activities or financial transactions. The CIT(Exemptions) had failed to examine the charitable nature of the trust's objects.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust filed an appeal against the CIT(Exemptions)'s order refusing registration under Section 12AA. The refusal was based on the trust paying rent to the settler's mother and a rectification in the trust deed.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemptions) can refuse registration under Section 12AA based on financial transactions or amendments to the trust deed, instead of solely examining the charitable nature of the trust's objects.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PATNA BENCH, PATNA Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM and Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava, JM ITA No.H4O/Pat./2016, Asstt: Year Akhileshwar Seva Trust Patna: (APPELLANT) PAN No. AAETA1397G Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions Patna (Bihar (RESPONDENT) Assessee by :Shri Manish Rastogi Adv. Revenue by Smt: Archana Sinha, Sr: S.C: Date of Hearing 15.03.2018 Date of Pronouncement 16 03.2018 ORDER Per Sudhanshu Srivastava,JM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against order dated 22.08.2016, passed by the Ld: CIT (Exemptions)-Patna refusing registration u/s 12AA of the Income-tax Act; 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act"), to the assessee trust. 2 The Ld _ AR drew out attention to the impugned order and submitted that the registration had been refused on the ground that the trust was paying rent to the mother of the settler of the trust and further there was a rectification in the trust deed_ It was submitted that the Ld CIT (E) had misdirected himself in refusing registration of the trust as at this stage the Ld_ CIT (E) 2 ITA No.110/Pat./2016 should have inquired into the objects of the trust and genuineness of the activities. It was prayed that the appropriate directions may be issued to the Ld_ CIT (E) for granting registration to the trust. 3 The Ld. Sr_ Standing Counsel for the Department opposed the assessee' s prayer for registration_ 4 . We have heard the rival submissions and have also perused the material on record. We find force in the contention of the Ld AR that at the time of granting registration u/s12AA of the Act; the Ld. CIT (E) is expected only to examine whether or not the objects of the trust are charitable and that the Ld CIT (E) cannot, at this juncture, enter into the realm of examining the genuineness of the activities of the trust: We find that in the case before us, the Ld. CIT (Exemptions) Patna has, nowhere in his order, disputed that the objects of the assessee society were charitable in nature_ 4.1 In the case of CIT US. Vijay Vargiyavani Charitable Trust; reported in 369 ITR 360(Raj), it has been by the Honble High Court of Rajasthan as follows: - 3 ITA No.H0/Pat /2016 "
In our view; the object of section 12AA is to examine the genuineness of the objects of the trust but not the income of the trust for charitable or religious purpose. The Commissioner cannot sit in the chair of the Assessing Officer to look into the amount spent on charitable activities at the time of creation of the trust. The stage for reviewing the application of income has not arrived at when such trust or institution files application for registration of the trust/ society: 4.2 Similarly, the Hon ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana, in the case of Commissioner Of Income Tax-I us. Sri Guru Gorakh Nath Charitable Trust; reported in 378 ITR 685 (P&HJ; has held as follows: - "
A perusal of the above section would go on to show that the Commissioner has to satisfy himself of the objects of the trust and the genuineness of the activities and after giving an opportunity of being heard to the trust or the institution, a refusal can be made to register the trust. Thus, the section gives power to the Commissioner to look into the genuineness of the activities of the trust and to satisfy himself about its activities. Under Section 12A, the provisions of Sections 11 and 12 shall not apply in relation to the income of any trust or institution unless various conditions are fulfilled The said sections provide ITA No.H1O/Pat /2016 that income from property held for charitable purposes shall not be included in the total income of the previous year of the person in receipt of the income.
The provisions of Section 12AA, thus, also give the power under sub-section (3) to cancel the registration of the activities of the trust if it is not carried out in accordance with the objects but the Commissioner has to keep in mind that it is not to act as an Assessing Authority while deciding the application under Section 12AA and the enquiry regarding the genuineness of the activities of imparting education with a charitable purpose is to be kept in mind. The objects of the trust; thus, have to be taken into consideration: Section 2(15) defines charitable purpose and the same includes relief in education and advancement of any other object of general public utility: In case the utility is carried out in the nature of trade, commerce, business, the proviso provides that the same will not be a charitable purpose: Sub-section 2(15) reads as under: 'Sub-section 2 (15) "charitable purpose' includes relief of the poor; education, medical relief; [preservation of environment (including watersheds, forests and wildlife) and preservation of monuments or places or objects of artistic or historic interest,] and the advancement of any other object of general public utility: Provided that the advancement of any other object of general public utility shall not be a charitable purpose, if it 5 ITA No.HO/Pat /2016 involves the carrying on of any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business, or any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business, for a cess or fee or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application, or retention, of the income from such activity: Provided further that the first proviso shall not apply if the aggregate value of the receipts from the activities referred to therein is [twenty-five lakh rupees] or less in the previous year; 4.3 A perusal of the impugned order shows that the Ld: CIT (E) has nowhere made any reference to the objects of the assessee trust, which was incumbent upon him at the time considering the assessee's application for grant of registration. In our considered opinion, the Ld CIT (E) should have examined the objects of the trust vis-a-vis they being charitable in nature and should not have ventured into considering the appropriateness of rent or the amendment in the Trust Deed_ Accordingly, we restore the file to the office of the Ld. CIT (E) with the direction to examine the assessee's application in light of the objects of the trust and adjudicate the issue in accordance with law after ITA No.11O/Pat./2016 giving proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee to represent its case. 5_ In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes_ (Order Pronounced in the Court on 16 /03/2018) N.K Saini) (Sudhanshu Srivastava) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 16 /03/2018 S.sinha*
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026