M/S. MASTRIN PHARMACEUTICALS (PVT.) LTD.,PATNA vs. DCIT, PATNA

PDF
ITA 93/PAT/2023Status: DisposedITAT Patna28 November 2025AY 1993-94Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY (Vice President), SHRI RAJESH KUMAR (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The assessee filed appeals against penalty orders under Section 271(1)(c). The quantum appeals for the same assessment years were previously set aside to the file of the learned CIT (A). The assessee requested that the penalty appeals also be restored to the file of the learned CIT (A).

Held

The Tribunal noted that the quantum appeals were pending before the learned CIT (A) and agreed that the penalty appeals should also be restored to the learned CIT (A) for adjudication.

Key Issues

Whether penalty appeals should be restored to the file of the learned CIT (A) when the related quantum appeals have been set aside to the same authority.

Sections Cited

271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “PATNA” BENCH, PATNA

Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VP & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Kumar, Adv
For Respondent: Md. A. H. Chowdhary, CIT (DR)
Hearing: 27.11.2025Pronounced: 28/11

Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy, VP:

These appeals of the assessee are arising against the Penalty orders u/s 271 (1) (c) of the income tax Act,1961.

3.

The Ld. DR fairly agreed that in view of the Tribunal’s order restore the quantum appeals, the penalty would also restore to the file of the learned CIT (A).

4.

We have considered the rival submissions and perused material available on the record. We find that all these appeals are filed against the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. As the quantum appeals are pending before the learned CIT (A), all the penalty appeals should go back to the file of the learned CIT (A). Therefore, we restore the penalty appeals to the file of the learned CIT (A).

5.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 28.11.2025.

Sd/- Sd/-

Sd/-SSd/-rrrttyiiisssffggttttdss- Sd/-S (RAJESH KUMAR) (DUVVURU RL REDDY) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) (VICE PRESIDENT)

Sr. Private Secretary/ Asst. Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Initials Sr. Particulars Date Person No. concern ed 1 Draft dictated on 27.11.25 Sr.PS 2 Draft placed before author 27.11.25 Sr.PS Draft proposed & placed before the second Member 3 AM 4 Draft discussed/approved by Second Member AM 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7 File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 8 Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 9 Date of dispatch of Order 10 Dictation Sheet is attached herewith Yes

M/S. MASTRIN PHARMACEUTICALS (PVT.) LTD.,PATNA vs DCIT, PATNA | BharatTax