Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
M/s. Vikram Overseas Ltd., E-44/3, Okhla Industrial The ACIT, Circle-17(1), Area, Phase-II, New Delhi. vs. C.R. Building, PIN – 110 020. New Delhi. PAN AAACV0028L Appellant Respondent Assessee by : -None- Revenue by: Shri Md. Gayasuddin Ansari, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 23.10.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 23.10.2018 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-9, New Delhi, Dated 23.03.2015, for the A.Y. 2004-2005, challenging the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961.
2 ITA.No.3470/Del./2015 M/s. Vikram Overseas Ltd., New Delhi. 2. The assessee has been notified the date of hearing twice by Registered Post. However, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. It, therefore, appears that assessee is no more interested in prosecuting the appeal. The appeal of assessee is, therefore, liable to be dismissed.
In view of the above and having regard to Rule 19(2) of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules and following various decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of Multiplan India Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.); Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court decision in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), and also the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) wherein their Lordships held that the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but effectively pursuing the same. Respectfully following the same, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as un-admitted.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
3 ITA.No.3470/Del./2015 M/s. Vikram Overseas Ltd., New Delhi. Order pronounced in the open Court.