RAM SARAN PAL,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-49(4), KOLKATA

This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT (Appeals) , 15, Kolkata both dated 04-10-2019 for the assessment years 2015-16.

. So the ld. CIT(A) presumed that the assessee is not interested to pursue the appeal, and, therefore the ld. CIT(A) passed ex parte order against the assessee. I note that the ld. CIT(A) was pleased to dismiss the appeal of assessee without going into the merits of the appeal preferred by the assessee. I am of the opinion that the first appellate authority has to decide the appeal on merits since it is the valuable statutory right vested in the assessee to file before the ld. CIT(A) an appeal when it is aggrieved by the action of AO. I find that the ld. CIT(A) has fixed the case thrice for hearing, however, he has not mentioned in the impugned order as to whether the notice(s) of hearing has been served upon the assessee. Before me the assessee has assailed the impugned order of the ld. CIT(A) to dismiss the appeal without hearing him and without going into the merits of the appeal raised by the assessee. In such scenario, I am of the opinion that his action is in violation of the principles of natural justice. Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that assessee ought to have been heard before passing the impugned order. Therefore, I set aside the impugned order of the ld. CIT(A) and remand the matter back to him to adjudicate the issue(s) involved in the appeal afresh on merits. The assessee/ld.AR of assessee is directed to diligently to appear before the ld. CIT(A) and in case, if there is any changes in assessee’s address, to furnish the same before the ld. CIT(A) and to appear promptly before the ld. CIT(A) during the appellate proceedings without fail. The ld. CIT(A) shall decide the case afresh in accordance with law by passing a speaking order and after giving the assessee adequate opportunity of hearing.

3. In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.