DY CIT 31(3), MUMBAI vs. THE JAWAHAR NAGAR CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable as the tax effect was below the revised monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The tax effect involved in the appeal was found to be less than Rs. 50 lacs.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal before the ITAT based on the monetary limits set by CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” Bench, Mumbai
Before: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ravish Sood
O R D E R
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM
The captioned appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-42, Mumbai, dated 21.03.2018, which in turn arises from the assessment order passed by the A.O under Sec.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act’), dated 16.11.2016.
We find that the ‘tax effect’ involved in the present appeal filed by the revenue is less than Rs.50 lacs. On the basis of the aforesaid fact, the appeal filed by the revenue as per the monetary limits revised by the CBDT vide its Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 is found to be not maintainable.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026