M/S YASKAWA INDIA PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(2), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the AO to verify the TDS and advance tax payments. Credit for these payments should be granted if established and not already allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order. The Transfer Pricing (TP) issue was resolved under MAP, and the assessee decided not to press corporate tax grounds. The assessee pressed only an additional ground regarding credit for TDS and advance tax.
What were the issues?
Whether credit for TDS and advance tax payments should be granted while determining the refund, and if so, after verification by the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI ARUN KUMAR GARODIA & SHRI LALIET KUMAR
Per Shri A.K. Garodia, Accountant Member This appeal is filed by the assessee and the same is directed against the assessment order dated 26.09.2017 passed by the AO u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) and 263 of IT Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The assessee has raised as many as 7 grounds of appeal including one corporate tax ground and in addition to that, the assessee has also raised an additional ground. In course of hearing before us, it was submitted by ld. AR of assessee that the TP issue has been resolved under MAP and the assessee is not interested in pressing the ground raised by the assessee in respect of corporate tax issue raised in the original grounds. It was submitted by ld. AR of assessee that the assessee is interested in pressing only the additional ground and the remaining grounds are not pressed. Accordingly all the grounds of appeal except the additional ground are rejected as not pressed. The additional ground raised by the assessee reads as under. “1. The Appellant submits that the credit for TDS of Rs.13,52,859/- and advance tax payment of Rs.20,00,000/- for AY 2013-14 should be granted while determine the refund. The Appellant prays accordingly.”
Regarding additional ground, it was submitted by ld. AR of assessee that this issue may be restored back to the file of AO for a decision as per law after verifying the facts. The ld. DR of revenue supported the assessment order.
We have considered the rival submissions. We find that the only issue raised by assessee in the additional ground of appeal is that the credit for TDS of Rs. 13,52,859/- and advance tax payment of Rs. 20 Lakhs should be granted while determining the refund. In our considered opinion, credit for TDS and advance tax should be granted if the assessee establishes that payments have been made and credit for the same was not allowed earlier.
Hence we restore this matter back to the file of AO for fresh decision on this aspect and to the extent the assessee is able to establish regarding payment of TDS and advance tax, credit for the same should be allowed to the assessee if not already allowed. This ground of appeal of assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page. (LALIET KUMAR) Accountant Member Bangalore, Dated, the 25th April, 2019. /MS/ Copy to:
Appellant
CIT(A)
Respondent
DR, ITAT, Bangalore
CIT
Guard file By order
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026