M/S YASKAWA INDIA PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(2), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2069/BANG/2017Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 April 2019AY 2013-143 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the matter to the AO to verify the TDS and advance tax payments. Credit for these payments should be granted if established and not already allowed.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order. The Transfer Pricing (TP) issue was resolved under MAP, and the assessee decided not to press corporate tax grounds. The assessee pressed only an additional ground regarding credit for TDS and advance tax.

What were the issues?

Whether credit for TDS and advance tax payments should be granted while determining the refund, and if so, after verification by the AO.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 263

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI ARUN KUMAR GARODIA & SHRI LALIET KUMAR

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Kumar J Jain, Advocate
For Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT (DR)
Hearing: 23.04.2019Pronounced: 25.04.2019

Per Shri A.K. Garodia, Accountant Member This appeal is filed by the assessee and the same is directed against the assessment order dated 26.09.2017 passed by the AO u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) and 263 of IT Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The assessee has raised as many as 7 grounds of appeal including one corporate tax ground and in addition to that, the assessee has also raised an additional ground. In course of hearing before us, it was submitted by ld. AR of assessee that the TP issue has been resolved under MAP and the assessee is not interested in pressing the ground raised by the assessee in respect of corporate tax issue raised in the original grounds. It was submitted by ld. AR of assessee that the assessee is interested in pressing only the additional ground and the remaining grounds are not pressed. Accordingly all the grounds of appeal except the additional ground are rejected as not pressed. The additional ground raised by the assessee reads as under. “1. The Appellant submits that the credit for TDS of Rs.13,52,859/- and advance tax payment of Rs.20,00,000/- for AY 2013-14 should be granted while determine the refund. The Appellant prays accordingly.”

2.

Regarding additional ground, it was submitted by ld. AR of assessee that this issue may be restored back to the file of AO for a decision as per law after verifying the facts. The ld. DR of revenue supported the assessment order.

3.

We have considered the rival submissions. We find that the only issue raised by assessee in the additional ground of appeal is that the credit for TDS of Rs. 13,52,859/- and advance tax payment of Rs. 20 Lakhs should be granted while determining the refund. In our considered opinion, credit for TDS and advance tax should be granted if the assessee establishes that payments have been made and credit for the same was not allowed earlier.

Hence we restore this matter back to the file of AO for fresh decision on this aspect and to the extent the assessee is able to establish regarding payment of TDS and advance tax, credit for the same should be allowed to the assessee if not already allowed. This ground of appeal of assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page. (LALIET KUMAR) Accountant Member Bangalore, Dated, the 25th April, 2019. /MS/ Copy to:

1.

Appellant

4.

CIT(A)

2.

Respondent

5.

DR, ITAT, Bangalore

3.

CIT

6.

Guard file By order

More judgments on Section 144C(13)

All 3,426 judgments and leading authorities on Section 144C(13) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →