ELARA INDIA OPPORTUNITIES FUND LIMITED,MAURITIUS vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF THE INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) - 2(2)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal ruled that the transactions in ICL shares were genuine, not a 'penny stock' manipulation. They found no evidence of the assessee's involvement in price rigging and noted a reasonable price increase over the holding period.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Foreign Portfolio Investor (FPI) resident in Mauritius, sold shares of International Conveyors Limited (ICL) after holding them for about 10 years. The Revenue Authorities treated the sale as a bogus transaction, classifying ICL shares as 'penny stock', and made additions under Sections 68 and 69C.
What were the issues?
Whether the sale of ICL shares constituted a genuine transaction or a bogus one for availing long-term capital gains, and if additions under Sections 68 and 69C were justified given the assessee's status as an FPI and the holding period.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 144C(5),Section 68,Section 69C,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 153,Section 234B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pr. CIT v. Jogot Pravinbhai Sarabhai15 citing142 Taxmann.com 247 · 2022 · HC
- Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Mamta Rajivkumar Agarwal15 citing155 Taxmann.com 549 · 2023 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, I BENCH MUMBAI
Before: HONBLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN & HONBLE SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
PER SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order 27.06.2025 passed u/s 144C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), by the Dispute Resolution Panel for the assessment year 2019-20. The following grounds are reproduced below: Elara India Opportunities Fund Limited “Ground No. I- The scrip of International Conveyors Limited is not a 'penny stock'
1 The learned DCIT failed to appreciate that International Conveyors Lim
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(5)
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Tbea Green Energy (India) Private Limited… vs ACIT, Central Circle 1, Vadodara, GujaratITA 592/AHD/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
- At&T Communication Services India Private… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 5593/DEL/2024[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026