Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
PER AMIT SHUKLA, J.M.: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT (Appeals)-2, Noida vide order dated 28.2.2018 pertaining to assessment year 2009-10.
In this case notice was sent to the assessee for hearing by Regd. AD Post for 12.11.2018 at the address mentioned in Form No. 36 vide Colmun No. 10 wherein the assessee is required to indicate the address at which notices are be sent.
However, at the time of hearing no one was present on behalf of the assessee. The appeal was passed over. Despite the same, in the second round also no one was present. 3. A perusal of the record shows that the date of hearing was intimated to the assessee. Despite the same neither anyone was present nor was any request for adjournment received. From the above it is evident that the assessee is not interested in the prosecution of appeal.
Considering the facts and keeping in view the provisions of Order V Rule 19A of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, as were considered in the cases of CIT vs. Multiplan (India) Pvt. Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del); and Late Tukoji Rao Holkar, 223 ITR 480 (MP), we dismiss this appeal filed by the assessee. The assessee, if so advised, shall be free to move this Tribunal praying for recalling of this order and explaining the reasons for non-compliance etc. and if the Bench is so satisfied about the reasons etc., then this order shall be recalled.
In the result appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine.