M/S URBAN DEVELOPEMENT AUTHORITY,BIDAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, BIDAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 235/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 April 2019AY 2013-143 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the orders of the CIT(A) and restored the matters back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision. This was to be done after the CIT(Exemption) passed a fresh order on the assessee's application for registration under Section 12AA.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeals were filed against orders of the CIT(A) concerning exemption claims. The core issue revolved around the assessee's registration under Section 12AA, which was pending fresh consideration by the CIT(Exemption) as per a previous tribunal order.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) could decide exemption claims when the assessee's registration under Section 12AA was subject to de novo consideration by the CIT(Exemption).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA,Section 11

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH ‘SMC-C’, BANGALORE

Before: SHRI A.K.GARODIA, ACCOUNANT MEMBER

For Respondent: Shri Palani Kumar, Addl. CIT (DR)

O R D E R PER A. K. GARODIA, A.M.: All these five appeals are filed by the assessee and these are directed against three separate orders of CIT (A) – Kalaburagi all dated 29.11.2018. These appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by way of this common order for the sake of convenience.

2.

The assessee has raised several grounds in each year but as per identical Ground No. 5 raised in each year as under, this is the claim of the assessee that as per the tribunal order dated 01.10.2018 in the issue regarding registration u/s 12AA is restored back to CIT (Exemption) for denovo consideration. This tribunal order is also enclosed in the Appeal Memo and therefore, it was considered proper that the matter has to go back to CIT (A) for a fresh decision after the fresh order of CIT (E) as directed by the tribunal. Hence, the request of the learned AR of the assessee for adjournment was rejected and these appeals were heard ex parte qua the assessee and are being disposed of by way of this common order for the sake of convenience. “05. That this Hon’ble Tribunal set aside the order of rejection of exemption passed by the CIT (Exemption) and remanded the matter back to CIT (Exemptions) for de novo consideration in the light of the facts placed before the Hon’ble Tribunal. As per the order of this Hon’ble Tribunal, the CIT (Exemptions) is directed to decide the application for grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Act afresh after affording assessee opportunity of being heard. The order in ITA No. 1763/Bang/2017 dated 01.10.2018 is enclosed as Annexure C.” Learned DR of the revenue supported the orders of CIT (A).

3.

I have considered the submissions of the learned DR of the revenue and gone through the material available on records including the impugned orders of CIT (A) and the tribunal order in the proceedings u/s 12AA. I find that as per order dated 01.10.2018 in the proceedings u/s 12AA, the tribunal has remanded the matter back to the CIT (Exemptions) with the direction that he should decide the application for registration u/s 12AAof the Act of the assessee afresh. I also find that as per the impugned orders of CIT (A) in all these five years, the issue regarding the claim of the assessee for exemption u/s 11 was decided by him against the assessee on this basis that the assessee was not having registration u/s 12AA of the Income tax Act, 1961. This issue is restored by the tribunal to CIT (Exemptions) with the direction that he should decide the application for registration u/s 12AAof the Act of the assessee afresh. Hence, in my considered opinion, the issues involved in the present appeals should go back to CIT (A) for fresh decision after the fresh decision of CIT (Exemptions) in the proceedings u/s 12AA. Hence, I set aside all these orders of CIT (A) and restore the entire matter back to his file for a fresh decision after considering the fresh order to be passed by CIT (Exemptions) as per the direction of the tribunal in the proceedings u/s 12AA and after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to both sides. In view of this decision, no adjudication on merit is called for at the present stage.

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →