SUNFLOWER EDUCATION TRUST,SURENDRANAGAR vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal observed that the assessee had submitted documents, but the CIT's order did not reflect consideration of these documents. Therefore, the Tribunal decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity to justify its claim.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust engaged in educational activities, applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application for non-furnishing of required documents and details regarding the trust's activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) properly considered the documents submitted by the assessee before rejecting the application for registration under Section 12AA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: MS. ANNAPURNA GUPTA
PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Instant appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 21.08.2018 passed by the CIT(Exemptions), Ahmedabad whereby and whereunder the application under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) of the Trust has been rejected.
With the assistance of the ld.representatives, we have perused the materials available on record. It emerges out from the impugned order that the assessee is trust engaged in the educational activities. It filed an application under section 12AA of the Act for registration. The CIT(Exemption) vide letter dated 10.4.2018 directed the assessee to furnish detailed note on the activities actually carried out by the trust along with ITA.No.1943/Ahd/2018 2 certain documents mentioned in the order impugned before us. However, the assessee could not file the same in due time. Subsequently, another notice dated 2.7.2018 was issued to the assessee granting further opportunity to the assessee to furnish details mentioned in the order in regard to registration of the trust, however, no documents stated to be furnished by the assessee. The CIT(Exemption) therefore, in the absence of any documentary evidence about the activities of the Trust as well as other relevant documents for considering the registration under section 12AA of the Act, rejected the application of the assessee. On the contrary, a perusal of the record would reveal that a set of documents as required by the Revenue was submitted by the assessee before the ld.CIT(E). To support its application, the assessee has filed copies of forwarding letter bearing endorsement of the department dated 20.8.2018 on the letter head of the Trust, which are available in the paper book filed before the Tribunal by the assessee. It is pertinent to note that while the above endorsement bears the date of receipt as 20.8.2018, whereas the order impugned is dated 21.8.2018. Without going into the merits of the case, it appears that if the assessee has a case in support of its registration under section 12AA of the Act, then it has to be justified by adducing evidences as required by the Revenue and thereafter deliberated upon. This aspect is not evident from the order impugned.
In that view of the matter, it is our considered opinion that one more opportunity is to be given to the assessee to justify its claim in support of application filed under section 12AA of the Act. With this observation, we dispose of the appeal of the assessee with direction upon the ld.CIT(Exemption) to provide one more opportunity to the assessee to submit relevant documents required by the ld.CIT(E), and thereafter pass reasoned order on the application so made under section 12AA of the Act upon giving an opportunity of hearing to the assessee and upon consideration of evidence
ITA.No.1943/Ahd/2018 3 on record or any other evidences the assessee may choose to file at the time of hearing.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the Court on 13th April, 2022 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026