SUNFLOWER EDUCATION TRUST,SURENDRANAGAR vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1943/AHD/2018Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 April 20223 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal observed that the assessee had submitted documents, but the CIT's order did not reflect consideration of these documents. Therefore, the Tribunal decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity to justify its claim.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a trust engaged in educational activities, applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application for non-furnishing of required documents and details regarding the trust's activities.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemption) properly considered the documents submitted by the assessee before rejecting the application for registration under Section 12AA.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: MS. ANNAPURNA GUPTA

For Appellant: Shri Chirag Shah, AR
Hearing: 05/04/2022Pronounced: 13/04/2022

PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1.

Instant appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 21.08.2018 passed by the CIT(Exemptions), Ahmedabad whereby and whereunder the application under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) of the Trust has been rejected.

2.

With the assistance of the ld.representatives, we have perused the materials available on record. It emerges out from the impugned order that the assessee is trust engaged in the educational activities. It filed an application under section 12AA of the Act for registration. The CIT(Exemption) vide letter dated 10.4.2018 directed the assessee to furnish detailed note on the activities actually carried out by the trust along with ITA.No.1943/Ahd/2018 2 certain documents mentioned in the order impugned before us. However, the assessee could not file the same in due time. Subsequently, another notice dated 2.7.2018 was issued to the assessee granting further opportunity to the assessee to furnish details mentioned in the order in regard to registration of the trust, however, no documents stated to be furnished by the assessee. The CIT(Exemption) therefore, in the absence of any documentary evidence about the activities of the Trust as well as other relevant documents for considering the registration under section 12AA of the Act, rejected the application of the assessee. On the contrary, a perusal of the record would reveal that a set of documents as required by the Revenue was submitted by the assessee before the ld.CIT(E). To support its application, the assessee has filed copies of forwarding letter bearing endorsement of the department dated 20.8.2018 on the letter head of the Trust, which are available in the paper book filed before the Tribunal by the assessee. It is pertinent to note that while the above endorsement bears the date of receipt as 20.8.2018, whereas the order impugned is dated 21.8.2018. Without going into the merits of the case, it appears that if the assessee has a case in support of its registration under section 12AA of the Act, then it has to be justified by adducing evidences as required by the Revenue and thereafter deliberated upon. This aspect is not evident from the order impugned.

3.

In that view of the matter, it is our considered opinion that one more opportunity is to be given to the assessee to justify its claim in support of application filed under section 12AA of the Act. With this observation, we dispose of the appeal of the assessee with direction upon the ld.CIT(Exemption) to provide one more opportunity to the assessee to submit relevant documents required by the ld.CIT(E), and thereafter pass reasoned order on the application so made under section 12AA of the Act upon giving an opportunity of hearing to the assessee and upon consideration of evidence

ITA.No.1943/Ahd/2018 3 on record or any other evidences the assessee may choose to file at the time of hearing.

4.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the Court on 13th April, 2022 at Ahmedabad.

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →