ATAIPPA VARADARAJAN,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-7(2)(3), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for a fresh decision. This is to be done after the AO disposes of the assessee's rectification application for AY 2014-15.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed carry forward losses from AY 2014-15 to be set off in AY 2015-16. The CIT(A) rejected this as AY 2014-15 assessment order did not mention any carry forward loss. The assessee had filed a rectification application for AY 2014-15 which was pending.
What were the issues?
Whether carry forward losses from a previous assessment year can be set off when the rectification of the previous year's assessment order is pending.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC-A” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI ARUN KUMAR GARODIA
O R D E R
Per Shri A.K. Garodia, Accountant Member
This appeal is filed by the assessee and the same is directed against the order of ld. CIT (A)-7, Bangalore dated 13.07.2018 for Assessment Year 2015-16.
The grounds raised
by the assessee are as under. “Ground No.1 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the order passed by the learnedAO is bad in law and facts. Ground No.2 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned AssessingOfficererred by not setting off the losses pertaining to earlier assessment year in arriving at the totaltaxable income. The Appellant craves leave to add, omit or alter grounds of appeal before or during thehearing of the appeal.”
3. It is submitted by ld. AR of assessee that this is the assessee’s claim that there is carry forward loss in Assessment Year 2014-15 and therefore, it should be allowed as set off in the present year. But this claim of the assessee was rejected by ld. CIT (A) by saying that as per the assessment order for Assessment Year 2014-15, there is no mention of any carry forward loss. In this regard, he submitted that assessee has moved an Page 2 of 3 application for rectification in Assessment Year 2014-15 and copy of the same is available on pages 17 and 18 of the paper book. He pointed out that this application was filed before the AO on 05.10.2018 and the same is still not disposed of by the AO. At this juncture, the bench pointed out that under these facts, the matter may be restored back to the file of AO in the present year for a fresh decision after rectification order is passed by the AO in Assessment Year 2014-15. In reply, the ld. AR of assessee agreed to this proposition put forward by the bench. The ld. DR of revenue supported the order of CIT(A).
4. I have considered the rival submissions. I find that dispute is this that as per the assessee, there was loss in Assessment Year 2014-15 and for similar transaction in that year, such loss was assessed by the AO as short term capital loss whereas in the present year, the AO has assessed the income under similar transaction as income from business. The assessee has made an application before the AO for rectification in Assessment Year 2014-15 in which it is requested by assessee to the AO that in Assessment Year 2014-15, the loss of Rs. 29,02,980.94/- should be assessed as loss from business as against short term capital loss assessed by the AO in that year because in the present year, the income from similar transaction has been assessed by the AO as income from business. Since this rectification petition for Assessment Year 2014-15 is pending, I set aside the order of CIT(A) in the present year and restore the matter back to the file of AO for fresh decision after disposing of assessee’s request for rectification u/s. 154 in Assessment Year 2014-15. In view of this decision, no adjudication on merit is called for at the present stage.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026