ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. HAZI QAMRUDDIN, DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect was below the threshold specified in the CBDT Circular No. 03/2018. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2009-10. The assessee did not appear. The Revenue's counsel conceded that the tax effect was below Rs. 20 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Maintainability of the Revenue's appeal due to low tax effect as per CBDT circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “C”, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & SMT. BEENA A. PILLAI
This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order dated 21.01.2015 of the CIT(A)-19, New Delhi relating to A.Y. 2009-10.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite service of notice. Therefore, this appeal is being decided on the basis of material available on record and after hearing the Ld. DR.
The Ld. DR fairly conceded that the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the revenue is below Rs.20 lakhs and therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue has to be dismissed. He, however, requested that, if, at any point of time it is noticed that the case of the Revenue falls under any of the amended para 10 of the Circular vide Notification dated 20.08.2018, the Revenue should be allowed to file Miscellaneous Application for revival of the appeal.
After hearing the Ld. DR and on perusal of the material available on record we find the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue in the impugned appeal is admittedly below Rs.20 lakhs. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable in view of the CBDT Circular No.03/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 which is applicable even to pending appeals. However, if the Revenue, at any point of time finds that the case of the Revenue falls under any of the clauses as per amended para 10 of the said Circular vide Notification dated 20.08.2018, the Revenue is at liberty to file Miscellaneous Application for revival of the appeal. The appeal filed by the revenue is accordingly dismissed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed in the terms indicated above.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026