THE ROTARY MEGAPOLIS FOUNDATION,NEW DELHI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT erred in rejecting the applications based on conjectures and surmises without sufficient material. The main objects of the trust were charitable, and the clauses cited by the CIT were for efficient management. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided evidence of its charitable activities.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Rotary Megapolis Foundation, applied for registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected these applications, citing concerns about the centralization of powers with trustees, potential personal benefit, and an unsigned balance sheet with no donor list.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT was justified in rejecting the applications for registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G based on certain clauses in the trust deed and the provided financial documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT (E) v. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority23 citing395 ITR 18 · 2017 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘D’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA & SHRI KULDIP SINGH
PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER : The appellant, The Rotary Megapolis Foundation (hereinafter referred to as ‘the assessee’) by filing the present appeals, sought to set aside the impugned order both dated 19.10.2015 passed by Ld. CIT (Exemptions), New Delhi on the following grounds inter alia that:-
“ITA NO.6768/DEL/2015 1. That on facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed by the Ld. DIT - Exemption is bad both in the eyes of law and on facts.
2. That the Ld. DIT - Exemption has erred in rejecting the application for registration u/s 12AA.
3. That the Ld. DIT - Exemption has erred in rejecting the application in Form No. 10G for registration u/s 80G. 4. That the Ld. DIT - Exemption has erred in deciding the case without giving proper opportunity of being heard and dismissing the same on irrelevant grounds. 5. That the impugned appellate order is arbitrary, illegal, bad in law and in violation of rudimentary principles of contemporary jurisprudence.”
That on facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed by the Ld. CIT - Exemption is bad both in the eyes of law and on facts.
2. That the Ld. CIT - Exemption has erred in rejecting the application in Form No. 10G for registration u/s 80G, merely due to rejection of registration u/s 12AA. 4. That the Ld. CIT - Exemption has erred in deciding the case without giving proper opportunity of being heard and dismissing the same on irrelevant grounds. 5. That the impugned appellate order is arbitrary, illegal, bad in law and in violation of rudimentary principles of contemporary jurisprudence.”
Briefly stated the facts necessary for adjudication of the controversy at hand are : the applications moved by the assessee company in Form No.10A and 10G for registration under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) and approval u/s 80G of the Act respectively have been rejected by the ld. CIT on the grounds that the nature of the Trust in question is against the norm and character of a charitable organisation; that all same for personal benefits and the donors would be controlling the function of the Trust at their own wishes and objects; and that the balance sheet filed by the Trust is unsigned and is not containing the detailed list of donors.
Feeling aggrieved, the assessee company has come up before the Tribunal by challenging the impugned order passed by ld. CIT by way of filing the present appeals.
We have heard the ld. Authorized Representatives of the parties to the appeal, gone through the documents relied upon and orders passed by the revenue authorities below in the light of the facts and circumstances of the case.
Undisputedly, the assessee has produced before ld. CIT (Exemptions) the Trust Deed, bank statement, copy of provisional accounts, original vouchers related to expenses on charitable activities. The assessee has constituted a Trust vide Trust Deed containing comprehensive object clause with main objects as under:-
“5. OBJECTIVE CLAUSE The objects of the Trust shall be : MAIN OBJECTS a) Rehabilitation of Slum & Street children.
./2015 ITA No.4490/Del./2018 b) Setting up of orphanages & old age homes. c) Education of persons of economically weaker sections of the society. d) Rehabilitation of handicapped persons. e) Grant of Scholarships to the deserving students and support for books, uniforms, travel, accommodation, etc. f) Providing environment protection, pollution control and hygiene in the living conditions of the poor. g) Providing medical aid to the weaker sections of the society. h) Conservation of water and other natural resources. i) Holding blood donation and eye camps and other such health check up camps for the economically weaker sections of the society. j) Rehabilitation of victims of natural calamities, such as, floods, droughts k) To engage any other activity in order to fulfill the above objects.”
The ld. CIT (Exemptions) declined the registration and approval u/s 12AA and 80G of the Act to the assessee by picking up the three clauses of the Trust Deed which are as under :-
“15.15 The Board of Trustees may join, co-operate and amalgamate the trusts created by these presents or any portion thereof with any trust or institution having allied and/or similar objects upon such terms as they may in their absolute discretion think fit. 15.18 The Board of Trustees shall be entitled at their discretion from time to time to start, discontinue, abolish and restart any charitable institution, to impose any condition or conditions to any subscription or donation made by them and to earmark any portion of the Trust property or income for any particular object or objects.
POWER TO MODIFY THE TERMS OF THE TRUST IN THE INTEREST OF BENEFICIARY: The Trustees appointed in this deed will have the power to modify the terms of the Trust as they deem fit to keep the interest of the beneficiaries always in their mind. Whenever such modification is proposed,
Bare perusal of the aims and object of the Trust constituted by the assessee leads to the conclusion that the same has been established for rehabilitation of slum and street children; to set up orphanages and old age homes; providing education to the weaker sections of the society, rehabilitation of handicapped persons and grant of scholarships to the deserving students, etc.
The ld. CIT (E), without examining the aims and objects of the assessee Trust, picked up three clauses from other objects centralizing powers of the Board of Trustees to start, discontinue, abolish and restart any charitable institution and to impose any condition to any subscription or donation and that it may also join, cooperate and amalgamate the Trust with any Trust or institution having similar objects and having powers to modify the terms of the Trust in the benefit of the beneficiaries.
9. However, when we examine all the powers conferred on the Board of Trustees in the light of the main objects and other objects of the Trust, it leads to the inescapable conclusion that the Trust has been created for just charitable purpose. Main objects of the Trust are only to confer the powers on the Board of Trustees to run assessee brought on record the detail of activities being carried out by the assessee vide letter, available at pages 15 & 16 of the paper book, to the notice of ld. CIT (E) showing that in order to achieve the objects of the Trust, it has hired five rooms in slum and JJ area and has already engaged five teachers to teach children of weaker section of the society. The assessee has also placed before ld. CIT (E) updated bank statement, copy of provisional accounts as on 10.09.2015 and original vouchers related to expenses on charitable activities.
The ld. CIT (E) has also pointed out that the balance sheet placed on file by the assessee is unsigned and detailed list of donors has not been submitted nor the detailed notes on its activities have been filed. We are of the considered view that when the assessee has categorically brought on record the activities being carried out in order to achieve objects of the Trust vide letter, available at pages 15 & 16 of the paper book, along with annual report, available at page 18 of the paper book, showing the detailed notes on its activities, the registration u/s 12A cannot be declined on the basis of mere conjectures particularly when aims and objects of the assessee Trust are categoric one and they have already hired
Furthermore, when we examine the clauses 15.2 & 15.3 of the Trust Deed again it goes to prove the Board of Trustees shall spend each and single penny in furtherance of the cause of main objects of the assessee Trust and they will maintain the true and accurate accounts which would otherwise be subject to the scrutiny at the time of assessment of the assessee Trust in every assessment year. So, all aims and objects enshrined in the Trust Deed need to be read as a whole to work out if the Trust has been established to carry out the charitable activities.
So far as question of complete list of donors by the assessee is concerned, the same is otherwise required at the time of assessment and not at the time of registration u/s 12A of the Act.
Furthermore, assessee Trust is required to carry out the charitable activities only after getting registration u/s 12A of the Act. Even otherwise, providing registration u/s 12A of the Act is not a licence for any Trust to utilize the same for their own benefit and for commercial purposes, which aspect is to be seen at the time of assessment.
Ld. CIT (E) was only required to firstly satisfy himself if the Trust has been established for charitable activities and its activities Act. Moreover, in the instant case, the CIT (E) has not given any contrary observation that the assessee Trust’s activities are not genuine rather he has declined the registration u/s 12A and approval u/s 80G merely on the ground that Board of Trustees having absolute powers which, to our mind, are to be examined in the light of the activities being carried out and to be carried out by
Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in case cited as CIT (E) vs. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority – (2017) 395 ITR 18 (All.) while discussing the scope of sections 11 & 12 of the Act has held that it is not within the purview of Commissioner to examine whether the assessee was entitled to exemption u/s 11 or 12 since that was within the jurisdiction of AO and not the Commissioner (E). Hon’ble High Court further held that, “A body or institution which is functioning for advancement of objects of general public utility and whose activities are not in the nature of trade, business or commerce or sheer profit making, is entitled to claim itself to be constituted for "charitable purposes" and seek registration under section 12A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Charitable purpose primarily means that the predominant object must be to promote welfare of general public. An ancillary would not render such institution "non-charitable".
In view of what has been discussed above, we are of the considered view that the assessee Trust having been constituted to carry out the charitable activities is entitled for registration u/s 12AA of the Act and consequent approval u/s 80G but the ld. CIT (E) has erred in declining the registration u/s 12AA of the Act on the basis of conjectures and surmises that the Trust can be utilized for personal benefits of the Trustee which could be even commercial in nature without having any material on file in this regard, which is not sustainable in the eyes of law. Consequently, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed directing the ld. CIT (E) to provide registration u/s 12AA to the assessee and also to grant consequent approval u/s 80G of the Act. Order pronounced in open court on this 30th day of November, 2018.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026